Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays societies are getting more and more complicated. Consequently, demand for experts is increasing and being expert in one subject is fundamental for successful career and life. Many people may believe that it is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects, while others prefer to specialize in one specific subject. In my opinion, knowing many subjects and being expert in one them is the best, since, these two are complemental for each other
First, to be successful in a specific field, it is important to spend time and energy on that. However, when a person wants to learn many subjects, it is impossible for him to learn all of them profoundly. Since, for this purpose, the one should study various books, search different resources and gain experience in diverse methods. Therefore it is important to know one subject thoroughly and being aware of every minor detail about that. For instance, in dentistry, the doctor should know every aspects of a particular tooth in detail such as number of fissures, pits, cusps, roots, where depressions are located on teeth and many other details. This achievement cannot be gained without spending years in college and dental offices.
On the other hand, these days, by development of multidisciplinary fields in technology and medicine, knowing only one subject does not guarantee success in one field. For example, a dentist need to know about technology of equipment needed in a dental office in order to ability to work properly and renew old equipment. In addition, a dentist should be aware of medical issues because diseases and drugs a patient consumes, affect dental diseases. Furthermore, it is not unusual for a dentist to face some medical emergency while performing dental treatment and he should have this ability to manage that situation. So, I strongly believe that in order to be a noticeable person in a field, it is necessary to learn about variety of subjects highlighted in that field.
In conclusion, under this circumstances that the society and technology are progressing rapidly, people need to increase their experience in various fields, while spend most of their time on their major field.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 335, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...and gain experience in diverse methods. Therefore it is important to know one subject tho...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 22, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ed in that field. In conclusion, under this circumstances that the society and tech...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 357.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13445378151 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81428837684 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7509652286 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.2 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 5.45110844103 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155662722098 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581931134502 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933913911988 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0960641978072 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931411521519 0.0645574589148 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.