Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-Informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
News usually plays an essential role in our daily events, and we would make necessary and risky decisions based on heard stories. Therefore, the origin of news and their reliability should be validated before any decision was made. Our debate topic is a question that does need to check many resources to be well-informed about heard news? I firmly disagree with the statement that to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources because of time waste, reliable, accessible news channels, and update news issues reasons.
First of all, if you want to check many resources you would have to spend huge time to follow the news, it means the waste of time. Instead of check many resources, you can find a few reliable resources. In this way, you can address the waste of time issues and feel convenience about the validation of news. In other words, you may be overwhelmed by many resources; in addition, usually, there are anonymous resources that make striking rumors to attract more contacts. Take me, for instance, I am a stock market interpreter, and I have to analyze news to make a financial decision. I Usually would rather check BBC and VOA stock market channels, and I’m always well-informed about my field of work.
Moreover, if you prefer to check many resources for and new news that you heard, you would miss updates on the previous version of news.in fact, you are struggling with the last news that new updates on the news are published. Hence you would miss update news. But in a few reliable channels, you can check news and their updates very quickly. I usually prefer to explore avenues mentioned above two or three times a day to check news and their updates, and I’m sure I have never missed any detail about the stock market.
In a nutshell, in this notation, I have discussed the following question: does a person needs to check many resources to be well-informed about news or not? Because of a waste of time, a few reliable resources advantage against many resources, and be updated issues, I firmly would rather check a few reputable resources instead of many resources.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 439, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...med, a person must get information from many different news resources because of time waste, r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 228, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... new updates on the news are published. Hence you would miss update news. But in a fe...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 472, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ews and their updates, and I'm sure I have never missed any detail about the...
^^
Line 13, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...I have discussed the following question: does a person needs to check many resour...
^^
Line 13, column 90, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'need'?
Suggestion: need
... the following question: does a person needs to check many resources to be well-info...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, in fact, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1794.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88828337875 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65527385635 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487738419619 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 556.2 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5835184434 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.125 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9375 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273254868439 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107179785557 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867795321191 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190661532718 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570711488843 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.