Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents are the best teachers. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The essential question of the prompt is whether the parents could be considered to be the best teachers. Some people, if asked, might agree with the statement mentioning their childhood and remembering how their parents put the most effort to educate their kids while others would elaborate on the double edged situation because of too many factors involved. As far as I am concerned, I adopt the firm position that parents more often that not should not be considered the best teachers because for different children parents vary and, besides, parents can not know what their child will need on his or her way to a better life.
No one would disagree that parents are different. Some might be well-educated high profile executives, while others might be working their entire life on a plant without ever even going to college. I think that the level of education that these two types of parents can give their kids is distinctly different. I was lucky to be born to a family with parents who graduated from one of the finest universities of Ukraine and still was taught of what I know and believe is important at kindergarten and school. Others, like my childhood friend Denis, may not be in that brilliant position. Denis’ parents have not even completed their high-school because they had to work hard to make a living. When Denis was born they had to work even harder to support now 3 members of family. On our occasional conversations Denis sometimes recollects that he has never heard of any word of instruction from his parents. Thus, if you’re not lucky enough to be born to parents who are capable of becoming teachers, but as it happens too few parents qualify.
Admittedly, some people might argue that parents are the best teachers on the premise that they influence children the most as children see them do something and copy their actions, habits and often attitude to life. However, such position should be taken with a grain of salt. Those assertions are most likely to be made under the assumption that parents spend enough time for their children to observe them which does not always hold true. Indeed, a research by VM institution in Ukraine together with my own observations has provided me with a clear picture of parentship in Ukraine where economic state so bad that usually people have to work hours on end to make a living.
In summary, while there are various perspectives and viewpoints on the issue, it is clear that there more supporting arguments to claim against the statement that parents are best teachers because of the different type of parents that children can be born to and the amount of time parents spend with their kids. I suggest that maybe instead of focusing on the idea of parents being the best teachers we as a society try to raise more qualified teachers to give our children the best knowledge to succeed in their lives. Subsequently, we may have more happy and cheerful children walking in the streets. After that, isn’t what we all want?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 451, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...hich does not always hold true. Indeed, a research by VM institution in Ukraine together w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 172, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'are the best'.
Suggestion: are the best
...laim against the statement that parents are best teachers because of the different type ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, may, so, still, thus, well, while, i think, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2498.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 518.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82239382239 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77070365392 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58564484206 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507722007722 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 762.3 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.0237625671 48.9658058833 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.9 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175362087497 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556071079841 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475610614986 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115382178038 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022592502928 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.