Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities.
One of the issues the government concerns a lot is the successful development of the country. Some people believe to achieve this purpose it is more important for the government to spend money on the education of very young children than on universities. In my view, more attention to the education of children has a more positive and long-term effect on the country's development. I will explain my reasons in detail hereunder.
To begin with, five to ten is the best range of age to educate children effectively. In fact, children of five to ten years old, in comparison to students in the university, learn faster and deeply and also have no concern about their future to distracts them during education. I believe that good education at the beginning of the life of each member of society leads to prosperity in that society. For instance, if consider developing countries such as Germany or Scandinavian countries, it is clear that governments spend money on education more then anything. Actually expert forces that have an important role to develop the country are well-educated children in the past.
Moreover, some portion of persons' character shapes in this age. therefore it is the appropriate time for society to teach children, as a future generation, moral education such as honesty and helpfulness. In contrast, any lack of education during this period may cause irretrievable problems. Therefore, the government has to encounter some obstacles rather than focus on successful development. For example, imagine a country that the government spends money on universities more than on the education of children. Most of the students in this country have more problems at the university and the government should spend more and for educating these students. Additionally, in this country spend money on universities more than the education of children may prevent some children from going to school as in some areas the education won't be free anymore.
To sum up, I am of the opinion that spends money on the education of young children is more important for the government that cares about the development of a country. I think it's a fundamental step of the education of the citizens that should be free with the best quality for all the members of society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 551, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...vernments spend money on education more then anything. Actually expert forces that h...
^^^^
Line 5, column 66, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...f persons character shapes in this age. therefore it is the appropriate time for society ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 66, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: therefore,
...f persons character shapes in this age. therefore it is the appropriate time for society ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...t the development of a country. I think its a fundamental step of the education of ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, as to, for example, for instance, i think, in contrast, in fact, such as, in my view, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 8.0752688172 322% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1903.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 376.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06117021277 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94573176234 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473404255319 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 609.3 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3009128959 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.722222222 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.55555555556 5.45110844103 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.507109424655 0.236089414692 215% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167670972343 0.076458572812 219% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140006313761 0.0737576698707 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.334400450658 0.150856017488 222% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0156310996384 0.0645574589148 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.