Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children(five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Education, the foundation of the prosperity of a country, has triggered heated discussion on whether it is more import to spend more money on the education of young children than college students. Universities, in some people's view, should receive more fundings from the government. On the contrary, my perspective is that more money should be spent on teenagers for the following reasons.
To begin with, the fundings on children's education contribute more to the successful development of a country, due to the large number of young students. First, never should we ignore that the money spent on primary schools will benefit most citizens in this country. With enough fundings, children from destitute families will be more likely to get scholarship and enter the schools. As a result, most teenagers in this country will have access to fundmental education regardless of their financial backgrounds. This will, undoubtedly, improves the averge education of the whole country, and thus lead to the prosperity of the contry. However, give money to the universities will only benefit few people compared with funding the primary schools.
In addition, spending money on young childrens is more effective than on universities, because kids have more potential than adults. It is well acknowledged that kids require more effort to cultivate. During this process, some of them will get appropriate guide and education, and become expert or genius in specific fields when they grow up. These people will definitely contributes more than normal individuals to the contry.
Besides, in order to nurture these kids, more money should be distributed on training and hiring experienced teachers in primary schools. Young children, compred with adults, are not mature enough and don't know the significance of study. The experienced teachers are supposed to apply suitable pedagogical methods to each students so as to imporve their personal development. For instances, teachers should make the class more interesting, or engaging children in class discussion and presentation , which motivates kids to get active involved and learn better. In contrast, the students in the university is mature enough and are more willing to study by themselves. As a result, the teachers in university need to spend less effort on teaching, decreasing the requirement of traning and hiring teachers.
In conclusion, the money should be spent more on the education of young children beacuse of the large number of students, the potential of yound kids and more requirement of teaching kids.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the following reasons. To begin with, the fundings on childrens education cont...
^^
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng the primary schools. In addition, spending money on young childrens is mor...
^^
Line 5, column 374, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'contribute'
Suggestion: contribute
...y grow up. These people will definitely contributes more than normal individuals to the con...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 202, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... with adults, are not mature enough and dont know the significance of study. The exp...
^^^^
Line 7, column 332, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...le pedagogical methods to each students so as to imporve their personal development. For...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 498, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ren in class discussion and presentation , which motivates kids to get active invo...
^^
Line 7, column 555, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...s kids to get active involved and learn better. In contrast, the students in the unive...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, so, thus, well, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2177.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40198511166 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89183815571 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491315136476 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 662.4 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6352122039 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.85 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.15 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276154953249 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876138227476 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719932529916 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170321351839 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472253951383 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.