Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The world of education represents a fundamental part of our lives. Through education, we raise the future generation, so the quality of our teachers is the deciding factor for whether the youngsters turn to be leaders and developers of the nation or totally the opposite by producing a burden generation. That said, some people say that teachers, nowadays, are less valued by their own society; others disagree. In my view, I believe that there is no difference from the past in term of appreciation and recognition of the teacher for two essential reasons.
First, the job of a teacher noble job whether in the past, present or certainly in the future. Parents always pay great attention where their children are going to get the proper education. This means they valued the importance of the job and the ones who perform it. There is more awareness among parents to provide their kids the right education in order to thrive and achieve his or her career ambitions. Parents are in constant search of information and quandary to find the right school: curriculum, teachers academic backgrounds and the reputation of the school. As you can see, the importance and the value of teachers has augmented among the society.
Second, teachers today are more engaged. Besides their formal jobs as tutors, many of them exercise side jobs as writers, consultants, even as journalists. The status of a teacher certainly augmented with the time because we see more and more teachers occupying different jobs that are highly valued in the society. The regards of people changed compare it to the past, today people view them as not only instructors but also as rational and wise educators because they have more wide view than teachers in the past, who were characterized as parochial people. This reveals the high appreciation and respects the teacher have in the society of today.
In sum, though some may oppose my reasoning because maybe they are proponents of the improvement of education and they want to give more appreciation to the teacher, I truly believe that teachers are appreciated the same and even more than it was the case in the past. Not only because teachers are more involved in different jobs but also because the job of the teachers is and will be always respected by the society. No matter how high the level of appreciation is today, we should always seek for more improvement in our education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 380, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[8]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'will' and 'be'.
Suggestion: will always be
... because the job of the teachers is and will be always respected by the society. No matter how...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, may, second, so, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2008.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92156862745 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69588234581 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497549019608 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 632.7 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.3887631975 48.9658058833 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.555555556 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.45110844103 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229695583306 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714905457404 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577313684949 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14046665785 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548153203302 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.