Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.
It is axiomatic that in today's progressive world where we live, human beings can gain a lot of information from several sources. Although people in the past can only obtain their knowledge through teachers. While many individuals believe that teachers have to be esteemed and appreciated, on the other hand, others hold the opinion that so as to educators are not the only source of knowledge, so they are not invaluable persons as the past. As far as I am concerned, I agree with the former idea, and the reasons to substantiate my viewpoint are elaborated upon hereunder.
To begin with, it is crystal clear due to the advance of technology, different means to obtain information and knowledge are prepared for people. To be more specific, high-end technologies such as smartphones, tablets, laptops to name but a few; in turn, humans can quench their thirst for taught and lessons. Since having access to various type of information, dependence on teachers have been decreased in recent decades. As a result, students find their path only after they become familiar with the internet. Children can learn their lessons through online applications and websites like Youtube. Ultimately, educators lose their stage in society and they are not the main source of knowledge for learners.
Moreover, schools become a more friendly space for students in contemporary times. In the past, institutions use a lot of harsh manners and methods to learn their students. The punishments in schools were more than the modern era, students had to obey rules and criteria in an educational place. Also, teachers were more stringent in their class and a lot of assignments and projects delegated to students. In turn, children have to respect their masters and they had an incomparable stage in society. An example can bring this notion home. My father told me when he was in high school, many parents got help from their children's teachers. It was strange to me, but he mentioned that since people suffered from illiteracy many individuals inclined to take advice from teachers; as a result, teachers took advantage of their highly prestigious career which helped them to influence people's life.
In conclusion, having the aforementioned reasons and points into account, I do believe that teachers in the past had a better situation in society. Because in the past technology was not emerged and also school and particularly teaching was a job which high prestigious among people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ot of information from several sources. Although people in the past can only obtain thei...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 338, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ther hand, others hold the opinion that so as to educators are not the only source of kn...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2065.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0987654321 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81668120926 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558024691358 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4940400452 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.25 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156533363986 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046399713734 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358438290108 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0939954002978 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00442050703108 0.0645574589148 7% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.