Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
"In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today." Use
specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
One of the important innovations of humans in the recent century is cars. Some groups of individuals believe that cars make a big part of their life, and they cannot imagine the use of them decreases in the future years. I firmly believe that in the near future, the use of automobiles will be decreased. In the following paragraphs, I will elucidate my opinion.
Firstly, in the future twenty years, people will become more aware of the detrimental effects of using cars, and they less use of them. Gradually, over the years, the level of individuals' understanding of all issues have increased, when they have seen the consequence of them. Actually, One of the critical affairs that all people are grapple with is the negative effects of using cars in the recent century, such as air pollution, terrible rate of cars' accidents, and so on. For example, I remember my grandfather always was talking about one of the big wishes of his youth that was owning a car. On the contrary, nowadays, many young people like me lost their inclination to have cars because we are aware of the bad consequences of it. As a result, the use of cars will be decreased in the future due to raising the level of awareness in society.
Secondly, the rapid pace of spreading technologies based on the internet is high, and this trend decreases the rate of using cars in modern communities in the future years. To be more specific, new technologies that become in recent years facilitate the life of people in many aspects such as in their jobs, in their educations or in their daily duty they should do them. For instance, I remember when I was a kid, my parents always had to spend a lot of time in the bank to pay bills, and they had to use cars to manage their time. In contrast, in recent months ago, because of the situation that COVID-19 created for all people and also for educational centers, I could pass my courses in university from the internet at my home, which was no need to use any cars in streets. Therefore, in the future years, the use of vehicles dramatically reduces because of developing new technologies based on the internet.
In conclusion, the use of automobiles will have a significant decrease in the future twenty years. Indeed, people in the modern era are more conscious of the bad effects of using cars; therefore, they try to limit the use of vehicles. Additionally, internet-based technologies decline the use of vehicles and facilitate many activities that people can do them virtually.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 581, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...one of the big wishes of his youth that was owning a car. On the contrary, nowadays, many ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing the level of awareness in society. Secondly, the rapid pace of spreading te...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, talking about, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2073.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 438.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73287671233 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76962471895 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456621004566 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 677.7 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1378205002 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.166666667 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.77777777778 5.45110844103 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212305571739 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818301642278 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520361776376 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153248791525 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228475087252 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.