Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In universities, people tend to concern more about the career prospect of the subjects they learn. Some people propose that students should learn subjects with fast job growth, including science, technology, and engineering even if they are interested in other subjects.
In today's modern and sophisticated world, choosing an appropriate subject plays a vital role in people's lives. In this connection, there are several factors which students should consider when they decide to learn a major. Although contested by many that the matter of studying subjects which are fascinating for learners is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I concur with the notion that considering a subject job future can be a plus, and I will analyze my reasons throughout this essay.
First, people should study in a fast job growth subject to find a career in the future, which helps them to cope with financial tensions in their lives. To be more specific, people have more chances to be hired when they choose a major that is based on society's needs. Otherwise, there are not any job vacancies for them to make money and afford their expenses in life. According to my own experience, when I applied to a university, I contemplated my major according to my interests. I was a diligent student, and I liked my courses significantly, but I could not find a suitable career. Because I selected the major without a great future in an industry, I was unemployed for several years, and my parents gave me money, so much so that I persuaded to continue my study in a different subject, which has a host of job opportunities.
Second, if a person studies in the major which is interesting for them without achieving success in a career, leading to depression feelings. To elucidate, one allocates a tremendous amount of time to learn courses, so their ideal job in the future compensates for the time dedicated to learning. Therefore, they won't feel satisfied unless they become employed in a career. For example, my sister was interested in a history lesson, but my parents forced her to study IT at university based on its high rate of job vacancies. Although she did not like her major, she found a job after graduating from university. Hence, she realized that it was worth spending time studying a computer science major even she was not enjoying it.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on each side, I profoundly believe that individuals should learn subjects with high employment rates. Not only do learners become independent in their financial obstacles, but they also feel proud in the future stemming from their successful careers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...yze my reasons throughout this essay. First, people should study in a fast job...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stemming from their successful careers.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, so, therefore, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2038.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93462469734 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86961614313 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544794188862 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6308364462 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.222222222 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9444444444 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216047327869 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070179439609 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604451545953 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137875864684 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368416106632 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.