Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Watching television is bad for children. Use specific details and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Watching television is bad for children. Use specific details and examples to support your answer.

Television has considerable developed during the last fifty years. It broadcasts a large variety of programs, both for adult and children. I do not agree with the statement that television is bad for children. This is due to the the fact that it provides lots of educative shows and because it is a way of entertainment. I will explain my reasons, in detail, in the following essay.

First and foremost, programs for children are rich in educative content. By watching cartoons, children are gaining a lot of valuable information, in a funny and pleasant way. Moreover, it is a successful method to drag the attention of those who do not like to study using traditional methods. At the present time, there are thousands of cartoons, on thousands of topics. By the time kids go to school, they will have already accumulated a lot of significant knowledge and a large vocabulary. Not to mention that, these are so interesting that even adults enjoy watching them. My experience is a compelling example of this. I have a nephew who is four years old, and, of course, who loves watching cartoons. When I visit him, I often watch cartoons with him. I realized that much of the presented facts were not available when I was his age. I actually learned about them much more later, when I was a teenager. So, television is beneficial from the educative point of view.

To continue with, television is a good method to keep the children both entertained and busy. Unfortunately, parents cannot spend all their time playing and doing fun activities with their off-springs, because they have to go to work or deal with daily chores. Therefore, television is a good tool to keep them occupied. For instance, my brother and my sister-in-law have different work schedules, and there are moments when only one of them is at home. When this happens, there is no other person who could take care of my nephew while one of them prepares the meal, does the laundry and so forth. During this time, my nephew watches television, mostly cartoons. Thus, it is a activity which keeps him busy, preventing him from making wrongdoings.

To summarize, television is not harmful for children. This is because it offers numerous opportunities for kids to learn new things and because it assures nice entertainment for them.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ion is bad for children. This is due to the the fact that it provides lots of educative...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ion is bad for children. This is due to the the fact that it provides lots of educative...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 677, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...elevision, mostly cartoons. Thus, it is a activity which keeps him busy, preventi...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, of course

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1911.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86259541985 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86281593722 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547073791349 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7842271148 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.5 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1153846154 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.15384615385 5.45110844103 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230596910414 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691929957062 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100561187878 0.0737576698707 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1584856788 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0770210097189 0.0645574589148 119% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.