Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Over the last few decades, projects are getting based on teamwork, which will result in better. Many people opine that having interactions between team members in person would be better rather than connecting throughout the internet and communicating through emails. From my point of view, preparing projects by contacting in-persons will be more influential, and I will explore the reasons why I feel this way in the following essay.
To begin with, in regards to the technology and its positive effects on projects, words in emails do not have emotions. To clarify more, when people communicate by electronic applications such as texts, emails, and chat, they cannot correctly express their feeling, which may cause many misunderstandings. Words do not convey emotions, and they can never get eye contact's situation. My personal experience demonstrates this concept; when I was a teenager, I had sent a message to my cousin about her dress. Although I was dreaming of that dress, she had misunderstood my emotions and got mad at me for months. After a while, I saw her and explained to her about my feelings, so she got about her mistake. Hence, words in writing applications may cause some errors, which can put people in the wrong way. Should classmates or colleagues try to keep in touch together in person, their projects will produce better results.
Moreover, communicating in person for doing projects or assignments can be widely considered as a making good friends' opportunity. To put in a more vivid picture, when people have relations with each other through their university's or job's work and projects, they can find their common behaviors, feelings, and manners, so it would be a situation to make a good friend. In other words, emails cannot help to distinguish these aspects through formal words. Additionally, when friends are working together, they can produce surprisingly better work. Take me, for instance; I found my best friend three years ago while doing my university's thesis, simultaneously she was doing her project by my professor. Our professor wanted us to do some portions of our researches together, which was our golden situation to be best friends till now. Furthermore, the result of that research was one of my best research, and I published that paper in the ISI journal two years ago.
By considering all the mentioned information, one can conclude that producing better results of projects can be reached by connecting the group members in person rather than keep in touch with emails. Not only emails may cause some mistakes on understandings, but also communicating in persons may result in making good friends.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 16, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...in the following essay. To begin with, in regards to the technology and its positive effects...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, so, while, for instance, i feel, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2224.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 435.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11264367816 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93341260297 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549425287356 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3841455149 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.2 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242954420105 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776962098505 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643855148684 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154076677162 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240326550497 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.