Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Producing a high quality work is admirable by everyone. Even though not all people reach that perfection of their job, they try to use strategies that would help them to make an effective work. Many people think that an e-mail is a good way to communicate with their manager for their project. However, others disagree. In my opinion, students should practice meetings in person with their peers when discussing for any type of project.
First off, communicating face to face would help students to clearly understand each other by making questions to each other if is any uncertainty about the task. Students, who deeply understand the details of the work, would be able to perform well; therefore, the project would succeed. To be more specific, a decade ago, when I was in university, usually, my projects were scored high. This success was dedicated to my communicative skills. My approach toward my assignments was to meet face to face with my classmates and asked them questions about the project. Consequently, this type of meeting, helped me to clarify and understand more about the work that I had to accomplish. According to this experience, students should practice face to face communication, so that they could produce a better work.
Secondly, young people could get motivated and encouraged if they meet in person. For instance, recent statistics have shown that 87 percent of students, who met with each other during the time that they were working on their project, they performed better than counterparts, who did not see each other at all during their work. This is because by meeting each other young people shared information and helped one another to do their best. Overall, youths could produce a better job if collaborate with their peers.
In sum, Students should communicate about their work face to face. This is because they could understand and clarify things that they did not understand in the first place, and because they could motivate each other.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part time job Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- tpo 66 Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 360, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... In my opinion, students should practice meetings in person with their peers when...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as to, for instance, in my opinion, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 329.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05167173252 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67086271376 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507598784195 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1329178191 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3333333333 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2777777778 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05555555556 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222626340132 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764483105408 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410731640295 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146827102075 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392462380582 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.