Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
A person should never make an important decision alone.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People face a lot of challenges in life and in order to overcome them sometimes we have to make tough choices. Personally, I think that when an individual has to make a crucial decision, he should discuss it with someone else. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, other people might have experienced the same problem and therefore, they could provide us with a valuable advice. If our friends or family members were in the same circumstances, they could share what kind of consequences their decisions had, and so we could decide whether or not we would follow their example. My personal experience illustrates this reality. When a few months ago, my husband and I decided to purchase a house, we were looking for a bank that could finance it. In fact, many financial institutions wanted to work with us. However, we wanted to find the one which could benefit us the most. Therefore, we have asked for advice from our friend who recently bought a house himself. He explained us in detail which bank was better to deal with and as a result, we were able to successfully finance our purchase and save money.
Secondly, people with families have to consider preferences of their beloved ones before making decisions. Otherwise, it can threaten their relationships. For instance, right after moving to a new house I bought an expensive dishwasher without asking my spouse if he was up for this. When he found out about the purchase he got really mad and did not talk to me for a few days. He said that he wanted to spend the money on his car replacement since the vehicle broke down all the time. If I had discussed my plans with my husband, I would have avoided the conflict. Although after this incident I sometimes buy costly products, I always talk about them with my spouse prior to a purchase, and so we do not fight anymore. That is why in my opinion our intentions should be debated with our family members.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that critical choices have not to be made alone. This is because it can help people to make the best decisions, and will prevent conflicts between them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 311, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... I will explore in the following essay. First of all, other people might have ex...
^^^
Line 2, column 110, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'valuable advice'.
Suggestion: valuable advice
...d therefore, they could provide us with a valuable advice. If our friends or family members were ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 281, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...r decisions had, and so we could decide whether or not we would follow their example. My perso...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd will prevent conflicts between them.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, for instance, i feel, i think, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 43.0788530466 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 384.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.640625 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60732620832 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572916666667 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2797051628 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8571428571 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.47619047619 5.45110844103 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119528011667 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0380515510597 0.076458572812 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0309334307417 0.0737576698707 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0766320667181 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228764251848 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.