do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.
use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Forcing all university students, no matter what their major is, to take history courses and ancient studies would recognize an ambivalent approach. From my vantage point, approaches of this kind not only would refrain students to progress in their specific field of study but also would take their time and money.
First and for most, allocating some courses to history will not contribute to students as to gain better knowledge of their majors. There are thousands of hundreds major in universities which in students would be enrolled in. From computer science to philosophy, or biology to astronomy. Having students of these eminent majors to study history would not make sense at all. For example, why must an IT student with avid mindset to technology take history courses in order to obtain his/her degree? Or some students with an ample desire of gaining their degrees in medical sciences would find history courses both compulsory and bothering. Nevertheless, there are some courses in every program related to history, students doesn’t really need to know about past centuries and world rulers. That is to say, a biologist may encounter a course concerning to history of biological phenomenon, but these sort of courses are much more practical and useful for them rather than those courses related to history of the world, kings and kingdoms.
Equally important is the fact that students basically are tied with their schedule and their curriculum. Some may even work part time parallel to their studies as to pay the living bills. Thereby, forcing these students not only would contribute to their knowledge, but it will increase their level of stress and take their time as well. For instance, a mathematic student has plenty of schoolwork to deal with. We only take his/her time by having him/her in history class. The time that he/she can spend on his/her own field of study.
Last but not least, as students pay great and expensive tuitions, it is not fair to increase their tuitions by adding some other courses of history. That is to say, even those people who have gained their university degrees, are now dealing with debts of their university tuitions. Therefore, there is no need to put students in much more trouble.
In conclusion, although some may think history courses should be compulsory for university students, I am of the opinion not to trouble students. No practical use of such courses in every majors, waste of money and time are the reasons that convince me to hold opposed view.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 396, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: an; IT
...ake sense at all. For example, why must an IT student with avid mindset to technology...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 897, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this sort' or 'these nulls'?
Suggestion: this sort; these nulls
...o history of biological phenomenon, but these sort of courses are much more practical and ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...ory of the world, kings and kingdoms. Equally important is the fact that students bas...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...nd their curriculum. Some may even work part time parallel to their studies as to pay the...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, nevertheless, really, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, of course, sort of, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2106.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02625298329 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53236690314 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520286396181 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8944845079 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.285714286 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9523809524 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310442385826 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.097182247075 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566103450447 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184074074911 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520217528007 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.