Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past
It is no secret that in the 21st century, world changes at a galloping rate. The controversial question arises regarding this issue is whether today's people are happier with their lives while everything is changing rashly than the people in the past. As far as I am concerned, individuals in the contemporary world are more satisfactory about their lives. I am of this opinion because of two main reasons that I will elaborate on in the following paragraphs.
The first reason coming to my mind to substantiate my standpoint is that the ways of living are facilitated by the means of some equipment, which provide each person with better life quality. It goes without saying that inventing electrical equipment including vacuum cleaners, laundries, also e-services serve people well. Before then, doing household chores was not only tedious but also time-consuming which makes for being less satisfied among people. For the purpose of illustration, a few years ago, for about two days we were out of electricity, which means we had to wash our clothes with hand, bearing the absence of light at evening, not watching television anymore and so on. Therefore, we had to live in the way of our ancestors used to live, to work from dawn to dust. Although it was just a few days, our routines had been changed. Additionally, even though we were the same persons, we were not the same happy family anymore.
The second reason has worth to be mentioned is that there are myriad of events which geared toward ensuring people to have entertainment. In modern cities, specific places have designed to give pure entertainment for their citizens, like merry go rounds, theaters, concerts, etc. Being in these environments artificially leads to a significant increase in the level of happiness hormones, which means the more happiness hormones created, the happier we would be. Based on the recent methods of treatments for the spiritual diseases such as depression, there is a method that psychologist recommends that patients go to concerts, hang out with their friends going parties, all of which contributes to prompt and durable euphoria. It is beyond the shadow of a doubt that past societies were deprived of these place with such purposes. As a result, whenever they got upset this feeling would be long-lasting which brought up reduced their tendency to live and being satisfied.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that living in later years of the world provides individuals with happier lives. Although it is hard to disguise the benefits of living in far-away years, contemporary age has eased daily tasks as well as created opportunities for people to be happy more than ever.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, second, so, then, therefore, well, while, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2266.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 452.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01327433628 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83779797469 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58407079646 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 696.6 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1652041562 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.263157895 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7894736842 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63157894737 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269299588895 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715896636362 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545351959521 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162594737661 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513738492708 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.