Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

In recent time, no doubt that our world has changed a lot , and the criteria of living differ from the past because there is dynamic changes all the time. However, it has been argued that some people think it better to have ability to relate well to people in order to get success in a future job. In contrast, other people think it is more important to study hard in school to be success in a future job. From my point of view I definitely agree with the latter for different reasons. To substantiate my case this essay will illustrate my opinion to elaborate my preference.

To begin with, to build up your success in your future job, you have to work hard in your life in general and your education process in specific. So, the first and foremost point comes to my mind is working hard in your education process with difference levels will create clear image to your future carrier. In other words take me an example when I was in the elementary stage, I was astonished in the weather of teaching process because I saw idol of teachers they had positive impact on my life. But when I got older I decided to study something related to the medical field because also I saw successful sample in my life.

Moreover, the second vital point should be taken into consideration is by hard studying will form a basic strong foundation to your future carrier. To illustrate my point, all the great and the most successful people worked hard on their educational achievement to get higher position. Because jobs demand myriad of knowledge, skills, and variety of communication skills. On the other hand, build a good relation with other people may help or enhance part of successful, but still the smallest part on the successful standards.

All in all, while some people claim that ability to have a good relation with people will enable them to have a successful future job may seem a good idea. I strongly believe the success comes with hard working in all the life aspects and begins from the school age by hard working.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...o doubt that our world has changed a lot , and the criteria of living differ from ...
^^
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are dynamic changes'?
Suggestion: there are dynamic changes
... of living differ from the past because there is dynamic changes all the time. However, it has been argu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, still, well, while, in contrast, in general, no doubt, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 360.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.625 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47871828196 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519444444444 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2643170894 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7333333333 5.45110844103 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304292795463 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109647760956 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870294873411 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192073024124 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302696545661 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.