Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

In today's world, the education of children and involvement of parent in it always have been in dispute. A controversial question which is often raised regarding this issue is whether nowadays, parents are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past. Some people possess the conviction that todays, parents have more attention to children's education whereas others hold exactly the opposite and allege that in past, it was more than recent years. I personally contend that in recent years, parents pay more attention to the education of their children than past. The following paragraphs represent a cursory glance at the most outstanding reasons.

The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is concerned with this issue that in the modern era, by advancement of technology and development of communication, people are more aware of events which are happened and their results. They know the problems of someone who suffers from illiteracy. Moreover, they want their children to have an appropriate job and condition in the future. Thus, they strive to push their children in the direction that contribute to their prosperous. One of these interferences is concentrating on the children’s education. Had they neglected focusing on their education, their children would not be successful in their occupational life.

The second rationale behind this issue is rooted in the fact that in the 21-century, most of the families' population are lower than four persons. In other words, in most cases, parents have equal or less than two children. This phenomenon leads to more attention of parents to their children. In past, the population of families were more than now. For instance, my father's aunt, has eleven children; as a consequence, they did not have enough time to spend on their children education. In addition, thanks to the development of technology people do not have to do some works which they had done in the past. All these changes contribute to the fact that people have more time and attention to their children education.

In conclusion, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that not only parents are more involved in their children education, but also they think that it is crucial that they control and help their children in their way.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 436, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...ld exactly the opposite and allege that in past, it was more than recent years. I perso...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind elucidating'.
Suggestion: mind elucidating
... reasons. The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is concerned with this is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'families'' or 'family's'?
Suggestion: families'; family's
...act that in the 21-century, most of the families population are lower than four persons....
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 294, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the past'?
Suggestion: In the past
...attention of parents to their children. In past, the population of families were more t...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 721, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... attention to their children education. In conclusion, contemplating all the afo...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, regarding, second, so, thus, whereas, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in most cases, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 8.0752688172 334% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1963.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20689655172 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8699186573 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48275862069 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 599.4 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7600659235 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.315789474 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8421052632 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42105263158 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338874370236 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124583194011 0.076458572812 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865814671861 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225193231889 0.150856017488 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0922224332237 0.0645574589148 143% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.