Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is no doubt that the teachers have critical impact on students, especially in the contemporary era, which the educational system contributes a leading part in every single student. No one can gainsay its significance on people's life. However, a controversial question is often raised regarding to this issue is whether teachers should make their attitudes known to students or not. From my own perspective, I do not share this particular view, and I have numerous reasons why I have no confidence to this opinion elaborating cogently in the ensuing paragraphs.
The first reason coming to mind consolidating my standpoint is that teachers need to reveal their attitudes for the students, because they have teach them what the ethic and moralities. In other words, they have to support which view is the right one for students so that they understand the world better. To be more specific, I should express that the elementary school teachers, and high school teachers, must exhibit the right and wrong principles. Psychologically speaking, the individuals, specifically students under the age of 16, do not developed recognition ability in order to distinguish the appropriate and canonical moralities. Thus, can guide them to choose right path among all other deviated directions thorough expressing their attitudes as the right one.
The other reason which deserves some words here advocating my viewpoint is that students usually consider their teachers as an inspiration, and role model. Hence, it is sort of accepted that teachers veneer them by revealing their own social and political attitudes. In this regard, the educational system can be hope to foster generations who are completely following the common values. As a result, we can observe a unity and solidity in the whole structure of society which can be really pivotal in order to achieve greater goals. This view took its inspiration from so called functionalism theory in the sociology, which is mentions that all the parents and other role models such as teachers need to express their attitudes for their child and educate them the values and ethics so that the society could reach the solidarity.
To put briefly, I disagree with the primary statement, and I guess teachers should reveal themselves for students. Because they are the role model for them and need to steer students to the right direction. Plus, teachers should teach students the moral principles. Thus, it is necessary for them to make their social or political views exhibit in the classroom. In nutshell, in fact, there are multiplicity of other factors supplementing the aforementioned statements, but are not embraced due to the dearth of time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'taught'.
Suggestion: taught
...des for the students, because they have teach them what the ethic and moralities. In ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 674, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to right'
Suggestion: to right
...alities. Thus, can guide them to choose right path among all other deviated direction...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 500, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e of society which can be really pivotal in order to achieve greater goals. This ...
^^
Line 7, column 520, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...not embraced due to the dearth of time.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, first, hence, however, if, really, regarding, so, thus, i guess, in fact, no doubt, sort of, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2273.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 434.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23732718894 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90754561219 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520737327189 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 694.8 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4909835258 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.631578947 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8421052632 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52631578947 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247786680008 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778187550369 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646418891502 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154223081126 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477646007843 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.