Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In many countries, people tend to share their social and political views with the people they associate. In fact, it's a natural need for human to communicate with others, and the mentioned issues are usually controversial ones, they like to talk about. Teachers are not separated from other people, and as they have lots of opportunities in the classroom to talk, it seems inevitable for them to enter these topics. However, many believe that teachers should avoid talking about their social and political views. Personally, I believe that such restriction isn't logical, for some reasons which are elaborated here.
First, although the classroom is mainly a place to learn, it is also a part of society. It is somewhere that many people spend at least six hours of their day in it. It seems a violation of freedom of speech to force them not to disclose their social and political views. On the other hand, how can a teacher who is not allowed to talk about his opinions, ask students to think and discuss their opinions anyway?
Alongside the reason discussed above, social and political matters are also subjects that students should get familiar with. It is not always the math or science that can help you. While having a knowledge in the mentioned subjects can help you in your academic life and future job, having a wide horizon in social and political matters is a critical ingredient of being an effective part of society. For instance, students who participate in the presidential election ballot can have profound effect on the future of their whole country. While teachers have great influence on their students, they can make them aware of many social and political facts. The important point is that they should not try to induce their opinion and make the students think the way they think. Advertising for a special candidate for example should be banned for teachers.
According to what we discussed, it seems that it is not a good idea to prevent the teachers from disclosing their social and political opinions. Not only is it against the freedom of speech, but also it deprives students of acquiring social and political knowledge. However, the teachers should not try to induce their opinions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ith the people they associate. In fact, its a natural need for human to communicate...
^^^
Line 1, column 558, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...onally, I believe that such restriction isnt logical, for some reasons which are ela...
^^^^
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'knowledge'.
Suggestion: knowledge
...science that can help you. While having a knowledge in the mentioned subjects can help you ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, but, first, however, if, so, while, at least, for example, for instance, in fact, talking about, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1849.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 374.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94385026738 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56367479151 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497326203209 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 569.7 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6286712163 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3157894737 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6842105263 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73684210526 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279720009195 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915490029021 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518268006748 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175119233052 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346040061667 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.