Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.
Technology plays a vital role in today's life. Technology has made our lives form basic to very much productive with innovation in many fields such as science, environment, education, etc. I disagree with this topic that technolgy has made children less creative than they were in the past. Instead, technology has made their lives more creative.
First of all, one of the major sources of education for childrens is Computer. Today the technology has grown to such an extent that we can learn anything from anywhere with the help of Internet. Also, the children get benefited from this by learning new and creative things from the Internet. For example, YouTube offers a variety of videos. Especially the educational experimental videos are for the sake of children. Many children watch them and learn from them. It also led them to think out of the box. Children's also try to imitate thode experiments and get motivated to do something new by themselves. In an earlier time, there was no such technology available therefore there is no means beside book to learn from. Thus the technology evokes creativeness among children.
Additionally, because of the advancement in automobiles, it is easy for the children to commute to their schools. In earlier days children have to walk miles to go to school. As a result, most of their time gets wasted in commuting and they get no free time to do other things of their interest. But because of the advancement in automobiles, they can commute in less and can do a variety of things of their interest. For example, while going to school on a bus the children can read storybooks, also they can practice singing songs. Thus, because of the technology children gets more time to achieve their interest.
Furthermore, programming helps children to make a creative website, mobile application, etc. Again the programming is a part of technology. Today so many innovative projects are made by the children. If the children are interested in programming they can turn their innovative ideas some creative project. So many applications are beyond our imagination. Everything we want is at our fingertips, it is only because of the varied advancement in the programming languages and the projects made with the help of this. Hence the technology leads to the arousing innovative and creative ideas from the young children.
Thus, technology has given shape to our lives and technology helps children to bring creative ideas within their minds to reality rather than making it less creative.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 724, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... is no means beside book to learn from. Thus the technology evokes creativeness amon...
^^^^
Line 13, column 201, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tive projects are made by the children. If the children are interested in programm...
^^
Line 13, column 516, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...he projects made with the help of this. Hence the technology leads to the arousing in...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2127.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07637231504 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83594691092 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472553699284 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 665.1 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1079239849 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.9642857143 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9642857143 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.17857142857 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313065808554 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887448794812 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0987125618592 0.0737576698707 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196731440179 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089955329267 0.0645574589148 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.59 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.