Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
I am absolutely disagreed. The main goal of making new freinds or fortifying the old relationships is that human want to socialize. It is not matter that how we manage our socializing process; The impact would be the same. There are some reasons to support my opinion as follows:
First of all, all of us are human and with the same intrinsicly properties. Human tend to find a freind for being rescued from solitary. Managing this process could be different one to one. For instance, someone like to has many freinds that their relationships should remain at a normal level and without infringing to eachother's life; In contrast, someone likes to have a few freinds but, just like a brother; These kind of people are so conservative and according to my experiences, they might have some psychological problems that they can not get along well, with different spectra of people; I mean the ability of handling variety of relationships, including dealing with a cousin, a close freind, a villain, a smuggler etc, is a social skill. By the way, one could not state that the limited number of freinds is better than a vast number; It depends on the personality of individual.
As the second reason, it is one of the charachterestics of adolesents. Needing to sympathy and empathy, nudge them to take some golden freinds who are the treasury of their secrets. Admittedly, those freinds could not be one from their folks. Before and after this era, their mindsets are different. A prime or a kid likes to have lots of freinds and spends days with them. However, this tendancy might be available even in adolesence. So, there is not any valid evidence that implies the generalization of this tendency.
Gaining different experiences is the other reason. Humankind like to thrive and has a huge appetite to try variety things. On the better world and as a paradigm, engineers embed some curves along a specific route to give drivers a kind of pleasure; This idea has been adopted from this psychological issue that people like new things. Finally, the old thing would lose their popularity. All in all, having different freinds sounds more pleasure than having a few freinds to human.
As a summary, were it is not for the intrinsic tendency of people, they would just love with their parents! Basicaly, finding freinds, itself is a kind of instinctively beavior to run from solitary! The role of freinds in our life is indespensable and all of us have to find freinds, whether limited number or a vast number.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 221, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'have'.
Suggestion: have
...e to one. For instance, someone like to has many freinds that their relationships s...
^^^
Line 2, column 413, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'These kinds'?
Suggestion: This kind; These kinds
...a few freinds but, just like a brother; These kind of people are so conservative and accor...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
... a few freinds to human. As a summary, were it is not for the intrinsic tendency of...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, well, for instance, i mean, in contrast, kind of, by the way, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2078.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 430.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83255813953 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80660196724 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532558139535 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 117.79114073 48.9658058833 241% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 98.9523809524 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4761904762 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10307790249 0.236089414692 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0241978653406 0.076458572812 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030837214185 0.0737576698707 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0573238885482 0.150856017488 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035246624895 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.