Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many friends easily.
In today's, every person needs a friend at every stage of life. A controversial question arises in this issue, which of friends more provide happiness for people. Some people old and prolonged friends more reliable and dependable for them, conversely, other people belief opposite side this topic. My opinion, I subscribe the first idea and explain my notion about it hereunder.
First and foremost, when every person and human confront with some predicament and an inclement situation in the during of span of their life, an old and extended period friends can be more reliable and dependable as a shelter for the people. Because this friend knows every trait of their friend and can comprehend them who were in this situation, which causes help and rescue them with advice and counsel for this disaster position. On the other hand, a new friend was oblivious and unaware of their traits and characteristics even their advice indicates the misleading way for them. As a psychological standpoint, an old friend more helpful in the solving problems which come in their life, and their hint be more practical for a dangerous problem rather than other people’s notion who opposite side this topic. By doing so, their relationship more durable and stronger after this occurrences and events.
Secondly, the most of the work and business activity need more loyal and faithful to collaborate in the between people to reach their goals dramatically and making pave the way to prosperity. Therefore, this cooperative is required not only more old friends but the more robust relationship between them as well. In the empirical study from Asia continent says that a business occupied with old friends in a project more be prosperous, and avoid and prevent them from being a failure, can get an impressive accomplish and achieve in every collaboration. However, new friends found everywhere and without any cognition are showing the path to a deep valley. Despite the fact that, the people think this way is the opportunity for flourishing, but this cause any failure.
All in all, in my opinion, more loyal and dependable for every people than the new friends who are even arose some difficulties in the relationship and more disaster for people and prevented them from happiness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 790, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a opposite'.
Suggestion: who is a opposite
... rather than other people's notion who opposite side this topic. By doing so, their rel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 884, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ionship more durable and stronger after this occurrences and events. Secondly, the ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 105, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'arisen'.
Suggestion: arisen
...eople than the new friends who are even arose some difficulties in the relationship a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 13.8261648746 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1904.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07733333333 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75273891889 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501333333333 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.0820180161 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.933333333 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179988070754 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705467827142 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376125774625 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129196950436 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00974832105195 0.0645574589148 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.