Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Term-projects are dispensable parts of academic assignments. Professors use projects to force the students to learn the lesson and practice the main concepts. They are also the means of evaluating the students. Classmates and colleagues can communicate with each other to do the projects better. Many people believe that it is better that classmates communicate in person rather than by email, and I agree with this notion for many reasons, some of which are elaborated here.
First of all, in e-mails, you have to write. Most of the projects include long mathematical formulas and calculations, and it is not easy to write them in an email in order to ask questions. On the other hand, there are controversial issues in the projects that need long discussions. Students should be able to represent their point of view and argue about them, and this cannot happen in the emails. It will take a lot of time to type your idea, send it, and then wait for the response. In addition, as the written statements can be read differently, they may lead to misinterpretation. So, it is actually impractical.
Alongside what we discussed above; when people communicate in person teamwork can shape. In emails, students cannot act simultaneously in a group. But when they communicate in person, many of them can participate in a group discussion. First, this can help them to obtain great energy from each other. They feel that they are not alone in the situation. Their stresses diminish and they begin to think together and solve the problems in the projects. Second, it can activate emotional intelligence in people. As the ideas are traded instantaneously, people may try to think faster and more novel. This is partly because people tend to show that they are useful in the group and have great abilities. Third, the students who are in the group may feel more responsible and compelled to try harder to help their colleagues. So, a student who may be reluctant to answer in an email may act so actively to be helpful in direct contact with the other people.
According to the aforementioned reasons; although some may disagree, it seems to be much better to communicate in person in projects. Not only it is easier and faster than writing emails, but also it shapes teamwork in which people cooperate better. It is recommended that students have some study groups in these situations so that they can communicate and do the project together.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, may, second, so, then, third, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2032.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9200968523 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88441451598 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506053268765 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.5288876572 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.1538461538 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8846153846 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07692307692 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22737142067 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605549452349 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643538181257 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155374630327 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733935626142 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.