Do you agree or disagree? Internet should be like other services such as roads, and government should provide it to the public with no cost.
No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the fact that in today’s communicative world we live in, accessing the Internet plays a crucial role in the level of awareness of people in the society. Though by using the Internet people can increase their general knowledge, its negative effects on the people especially children or young people are the subject of contention. Some persons believe that people should not pay for using the Internet; on the other hand, others hold the view that government should provide this facility for the individuals by getting its cost. I personally concur with the former group. In what follows, I will explicate my standpoints.
The first reason coming to mind is that people will have an indirect positive influence on their environment, if they access to the net for free. In these progressive days, people can do most of their routine works such as financial payments and shopping by the Internet. It is more convenient for them to pay their electrical or gas bills by means of online payment instead of going to the bank with their cars or public transportation. There is one example for more clarifying. People of my country should pay much for accessing the Internet. So, they prefer to go shopping and do their financial payments by their cars. In addition, in some cases, they might use complicated and long routines for reaching their destination. However, there is a good application like “Google Map” for finding our efficient way that people can use it when they are driving and have the Internet. With respect to the environmental issues, as people use less their private cars, the air pollution will decrease. It is clearly evident that, if the government had facilitated using the Internet with no cost, the air pollution would not have been increased at a high level as it today.
The second reason is rooted in the promotion of the awareness of individuals in the community. In fact, the Internet has paved ways for increasing our knowledge about every subject, which we look for. If we consider this point meticulously, although availability of cyberspace may enhance the general information of people, it causes some problems for them, particularly for young adults. Nonetheless, I think that its advantages outweigh its drawbacks. For instance, most of the researches are doing based on reaching to the network. Regarding new achievements and studies, scientists and researchers try to develop their work. So, it is not possible just by using the Internet technology. Beside these persons, ordinary people use the net for several purposes like food recipe, medicine and drug information and so much more. It turns out; priceless web can make a good environment for people to find useful information that they need very efficiently.
All in all, based on the reasons that I already mentioned, It seems to me, governments should provide the Internet for their individuals for free. Since it will have a magnificent impact on the environment due to the fact that in this way using the private cars will be reduced. Furthermore, if community’s people get access to the net easily, they will try to use it as a source of information. As a result, their understanding’s level will be increased. I hope all governments decide to apply this plan in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 545, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed on reaching to the network. Regarding new achievements and studies, scientists...
^^
Line 9, column 148, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nternet for their individuals for free. Since it will have a magnificent impact on th...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'nonetheless', 'regarding', 'second', 'so', 'for instance', 'i think', 'in addition', 'in fact', 'such as', 'as a result', 'in some cases', 'with respect to', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.234645669291 0.229887763892 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.138582677165 0.158761421928 87% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0755905511811 0.0866891130778 87% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0377952755906 0.046263068375 82% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0740157480315 0.0685040099705 108% => OK
Prepositions: 0.140157480315 0.118717715034 118% => OK
Participles: 0.0409448818898 0.0351676179071 116% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.94451242087 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0220472440945 0.0309702414327 71% => OK
Particles: 0.00157480314961 0.00188951952338 83% => OK
Determiners: 0.100787401575 0.0887237588012 114% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0299212598425 0.0209618222197 143% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00472440944882 0.0139019557991 34% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3340.0 2387.08602151 140% => OK
No of words: 555.0 408.028673835 136% => OK
Chars per words: 6.01801801802 5.86048508987 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85370353223 4.48200974243 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.336936936937 0.338922669872 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.263063063063 0.251872472559 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.201801801802 0.174417080927 116% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.138738738739 0.112833075102 123% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94451242087 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 278.0 212.727598566 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.500900900901 0.524397521467 96% => OK
Word variations: 60.8607060054 59.2087087015 103% => OK
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6684587814 140% => OK
Sentence length: 19.1379310345 20.5533526081 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.167271347 48.84282405 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.172413793 120.699889404 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1379310345 20.5533526081 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.655172413793 0.644075263715 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 45.4442373408 45.7405998639 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.66037735849 1.45489161554 114% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271723873254 0.300154397459 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0860397171655 0.103427244359 83% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0663984304985 0.0752933317313 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.431176952661 0.497263757937 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.15236784472 0.151897553556 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902562095594 0.114077575197 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553342239255 0.0781384742642 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.479591053431 0.336927656856 142% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0441633403608 0.067059652881 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196862944407 0.210909579961 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417739970899 0.0618886996521 67% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8870967742 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.86379928315 155% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.91756272401 183% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 10.0 8.42114695341 119% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 2.4623655914 203% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.75985663082 217% => OK
Total topic words: 21.0 13.6433691756 154% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.