Imagine that you are in a classroom or meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do? 1. Interrupt and correct the mistake right away; 2. wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and talk to the teacher or meeting leader; 3. say nothing
Making mistakes is possible especially when you are talking for a long time. There is a common situation that we all have experienced it; when a teacher or leader in the class or meeting says something incorrect and we realize it. Now there are three choices, we can either tell them right away, wait until session ends and the tell them in person or do not take any action. Among the three choices I believe the first one has more benefits although some people might pick the second or third choice. In the following paragraphs I will describe the most imporatant reasons supporting my viewpoint.
The first reason is that most speakers make minor mistakes when they talk and these mistakes may cause misunderstandings among the listeners. For example, most teachers use the names incorrectly when they are comparing two seperate categories , and if the students do not mention the correct name some will think that teacher is describing the other group and eventually become confused. This happened to me many times in the classroom and I was confused with the subject and distracted from the class for a long time thinking about the what teacher said. However, by pointing the teachers mistake rightaway most of teachers reacted in a friendly way and apologized for their mistake. So that is why I be
Other reason to be mentioned is that most speakers become glad if you mention their mistake for, it shows that you were listening attentively. We all know the more listeners are focused to the talk, the happier the speaker. Actually, the speakers consider listeners focus as an appreciation to their effort and talk. Moreover, it shows the speaker's ability in giving an intersting talk which can attract listener's attention.
Another reason is that listerner's contribution to the talk makes it lively. Actually, most famous speakers use this technique to absorb more people's attention to the talk. By this way the talk becomes more attractive and less bored becuse when one person talks for a long time most of the people become bored easily. But when there is a dialogue or even a discussion among one of listeners and the speaker the whole meeting becomes more interesting to watch.
So to sum it up, correction of a mistake in a meeting or classroom will block further misunderstandings especially if the mistake has a pivotal role in understanding the subject of talk. Moreover, most speaker appreciate listeners' focus on their talk becuse it indicates the talk's attractiveness to the people. Also, contribution of listeners to the meeting or class will make it more lively and interesting.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 325, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...right away, wait until session ends and the tell them in person or do not take any actio...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 242, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ey are comparing two seperate categories , and if the students do not mention the ...
^^
Line 2, column 608, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the teachers') or simply say ''most teachers''.
Suggestion: most of the teachers; most teachers
...pointing the teachers mistake rightaway most of teachers reacted in a friendly way and apologize...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 633, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a friendly way" with adverb for "friendly"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...take rightaway most of teachers reacted in a friendly way and apologized for their mistake. So th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'speakers'' or 'speaker's'?
Suggestion: speakers'; speaker's
...effort and talk. Moreover, it shows the speakers ability in giving an intersting talk wh...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'talks'' or 'talk's'?
Suggestion: talks'; talk's
...s on their talk becuse it indicates the talks attractiveness to the people. Also, con...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... make it more lively and interesting.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, third, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2168.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96109839817 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76873530814 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496567505721 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 675.0 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1646389514 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.4 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.85 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162281075051 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494222963494 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488578786827 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0962626793906 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643650217514 0.0645574589148 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.