Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
--Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
--Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader
--Say nothing
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nobody can avoid making mistakes as well as teachers or speakers. Mistakes have a terrible influence on our understanding of the meeting or classes. Therefore, we must to point out the incorrect content and let the listeners know. However, the time to interrupt the speaker is significant, because we need to keep the continuance of the class or the meeting. Besides, we also keep everybody know the mistake.
Immediately interrupting and correcting the error is very offensive and impolite. Although speaking to teachers when they are making mistakes can efficiently fix the error, this manner will break the attention of teachers. Teachers will be distracted and forget what they want to say next. Even they may feel very embarrassed and angry. However, if we talk to teachers after people all gone, students will feel confused about the mistake and be misled. So, waiting until the class is over is not a good time to correct errors.
The best time to point out the false is the break time of classes or meetings. When teachers and leaders are getting rest and preparing for the next period of the class, we can talk to them. They can correct the mistake after they back to the stage. In this way, people's confusion is solved as well as the order of the class is maintained. For example, when I confront that my teacher is making errors in the class, I will wait until the teacher goes to the office between the class. So, my teacher can correct the error in the next class.
We must say something when our teachers make mistakes. We all want to learn the right knowledge from our teachers. That is to say we have the responsibility to make sure our students receiving the right knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...f the meeting or classes. Therefore, we must to point out the incorrect content and let...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...also keep everybody know the mistake. Immediately interrupting and correcting ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is not a good time to correct errors. The best time to point out the false is ...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...correct the error in the next class. We must say something when our teachers ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, as well as, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 296.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78040540541 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5739164038 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 212.727598566 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496621621622 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 422.1 618.680645161 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.1092768718 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.75 100.406767564 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8 20.6045352989 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.65 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.85842293907 363% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227439515418 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705783908495 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410359323451 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133506723588 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299596618397 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 11.7677419355 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 58.1214874552 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.1575268817 63% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.85 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.