Imagine that you are going to visit a new city which one of the following ways do you think is the best way to know the city in a short time Visit historic sites Go to shops and markets Enjoy the restaurant and spend time in caf

Essay topics:

Imagine that you are going to visit a new city, which one of the following ways do you think is the best way to know the city in a short time?
• Visit historic sites
• Go to shops and markets
• Enjoy the restaurant and spend time in café

Travels are usually restricted in the span. Due to this fact, knowing a new city requires a well-organized plan. Many people believe that markets, restaurants, or coffee shops can represent a city, while I am of the opinion that there are few choices, if any, more beneficial for one who desires to know about a new place than visiting historical sites. I substantiate my belief by providing some supporting reasons that are elucidated below.

The first reason corroborating my view is that although shops and markets can show the visitor the costume of trades, people's communication, and merchandise that people in that specific city are interested in, it can be distracting as when one goes to the shop, it is somehow impossible to resist the temptation to buy goods that are fascinating. While watching and searching for what pleases one, he or she would lose track of time. Consequently, distracted as one might be encountering new items, they often forget about their aim, which was knowing the place. In contrast to the lack of attention that might be caused by markets, historical places are all about the city, and there is nothing to draw one's attention. Additionally, tour guides are available in historic sites and delightedly explain everything one might ask about the city. Thus, all the questions would be answered in no time.

The second reason is that notwithstanding enjoyable, the restaurants and cafes do not necessarily provide any information about the city. There are many places one can dine that do not serve the unique food, drink, or dessert which that city is famous for. Also, the people to whom one can speak might not know the city well. Take the youth as an example who are usually gather around each other in these places. A young person barely has enough knowledge about the city in which he or she lives to convey to a visitor. Without a shadow of a doubt, historic sites, however, are the cultural identity of the city. It is mutually exclusive to be exposed to cultural places and not receive information about the city. This is the reason that historical sites stand for the city. In historical places, there are many signs and maps in addition to tour guides that explain whatever one wants to know about the city.

In conclusion, the best decision to know the city is to go sightseeing. Not only visiting historical places keep a person concentrated on his or her goal, but they also gain invaluable information about the city.

Votes
Average: 8.2 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 541, Rule ID: NON_ACTION_CONTINUOUS[2]
Message: The verb know is usually not used with a continuous form, use the simple form instead. Suggestion: 'knew'
Suggestion: knew
...hey often forget about their aim, which was knowing the place. In contrast to the lack of a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 541, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...hey often forget about their aim, which was knowing the place. In contrast to the lack of a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 705, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... the city, and there is nothing to draw ones attention. Additionally, tour guides ar...
^^^^
Line 5, column 372, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'gathered'.
Suggestion: gathered
...the youth as an example who are usually gather around each other in these places. A yo...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, second, so, thus, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in contrast to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2056.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87203791469 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74122583626 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521327014218 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.8867794847 48.9658058833 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9047619048 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0952380952 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2380952381 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217219269925 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665225643428 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503920048127 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144357940543 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0148232854855 0.0645574589148 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.