To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors.
Professors have an influential and tremendous impact on our lives. In fact, it is utterly important to value and appreciate them because they provide us with the beneficial information that helps us to guide our nation to imperative progress. Therefore, I believe that the government should allocate more money to increase their wages in order to motivate them to do their job in most orderly and timely fashion. In the following paragraphs due to their benefits in both terms of improving the educational level and enhancing the social skills, I will explain my opinion more clearly.
To begin with, it is vital to start educating the young generations with a wide range of knowledge because this will help them to fulfill their and their country's principle necessities. Indeed, the professors will help them to do so because they are experts who are trained for such a task, they guide them and provide with the basic and fundamental data and skills which have a great influent on their future studying career. For instance, the teachers at the learning institutes are deemed as role model for almost all generation, they advocate their students with the best word of advice that have a great influence on their future personalities and broaden their perspective. So, this will help them to thrive easily in a community. Thus, following them and stay updating with them is essential for their well-being alongside their welfare. Furthermore, following their guides is vital in order for the best results to follow suits. Therefore, the government should show the respect and reputation for them by offering them high salaries that suits their imperative tasks.
Second, the professors have an indispensable role in building up a profound base of the communication skills. In fact, they create a friendlier atmosphere that helps their students to express themselves easily and clearly with their peers and that reflects positively on their future personalities and broaden their horizon. For example, they provide them with a cooperative atmosphere that helps them to engage in a conversation and deal effectively with each other. Moreover, this learns them how to cooperate efficiently and collaborate effectively. So, such a collaborative environment will enhance their interpersonal skills immensely which have a positive impact on their future workflow and productivity. In contrast, those who use to be isolated and not follow the professor's guidelines, they will be more vulnerable to a vast array of obstacles because they lack such a skill. In conclusion, the professors should be valued for their incredible role in improving their student's social abilities.
To sum up, the government authorities should have the obligation and eagerly seek to value their professors because they are the cornerstone of the society. Hopefully, they will be appreciated and respected in order to perfect their tasks and guide our children to a success.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 737, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...nd productivity. In contrast, those who use to be isolated and not follow the profe...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 68.0 43.0788530466 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2484.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 471.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27388535032 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91927349894 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47983014862 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 767.7 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4769234998 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.2 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.55 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0321883138252 0.236089414692 14% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0144454759888 0.076458572812 19% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0266309189639 0.0737576698707 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0283794424986 0.150856017488 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0140110509311 0.0645574589148 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.