It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city. Do you agree or disagree
There is two precipitation about children grew up location. Some people believe countryside is better than big city for children. But others are disagree and believe that city is more proper for growing up. In my point of view big city is better because of some reasons which will present in following paragraphs.
First of all, proper education plays a key role in children future and grow up. There is no suitable school and university in most of the countryside, whereas access to these kind of facilities are easy in big cities. To obtain good career and guarantee futures, children need to use equipped schools and pass high graduate. Maybe they can pass primary school in countryside easily, but for high school and higher they must move to big cities. Thus, moving to big cities is inevitable.
Furthermore, most of the countryside people suffer from lacking hospital or clinic. These days health problem is the most significant issues of family and they do not willing to risk and exposure their family and children in this situation. Most of disease came from as a result of dirty condition which is so common in these area. According to the recent article which published in health and science system (HSS), children who live in countryside get sick three times more than children who live in big city.
Last but not less, in big city children have more chance to have communication of variety rang of children. In other words, they have more opportunity to find good friends. For instance, I born in small city and grew up there, so I was in touch with small group of children and I faced with different problems when I moved to dig city for studying in university, whereas my roommate in dormitory who grew up in big city had better situation than me and was more sociable than me.
In conclusion, grow up in city prepare better situation for children to be success in their future life. Three major reasons discussed to support this idea.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
...n big city for children. But others are disagree and believe that city is more proper fo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 170, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...t of the countryside, whereas access to these kind of facilities are easy in big cities. T...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
... from lacking hospital or clinic. These days health problem is the most significant ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this area' or 'these areas'?
Suggestion: this area; these areas
...f dirty condition which is so common in these area. According to the recent article which ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 190, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'bore'?
Suggestion: bore
...y to find good friends. For instance, I born in small city and grew up there, so I w...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, thus, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 339.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76991150442 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54003712965 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525073746313 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.39218887 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8333333333 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37359882673 0.236089414692 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111956422929 0.076458572812 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939553137232 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207500525443 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718932215016 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.