Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Each people will give different answers to advantages and disadvantages of learning about past from their personal opinion and emotional concerns as well as even educational background, so, maybe they believe that learning about the past is a kind of wasting time, while other ones are interested to learn about the past. As far as I am concerned, I would like to refute former point and support the latter point of view. Therefore, I would like to address some evidence to substantiate my point of view in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, I believe that our present belongs to the past, and not only have we to learn about our the past history but also we have to learn something because I do believe that if we do not know our pasts, the past will be repeated. Therefore, looking the past can help us find our failure, and we can improve our defeat and denying another fail.
I will explain my point with an example. For example, after looking the past about improving the weapons, we can receive this result that all weapon has been being invented by humankind not only do not help people become place but also they improve war all around the world, The world war I and II are such examples.
Sometimes, Knowing about our past is a kind of sadness. For example, I live in Iran, In spite of the fact that these days my country is one of the third world countries, it has one of the biggest empires all around the world in 3000 years ago, and more than 30 countries were under the king's hand the biggest Kurosh.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 107, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...tages of learning about past from their personal opinion and emotional concerns as well as even ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, therefore, third, well, while, for example, kind of, as well as, in spite of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1250.0 1977.66487455 63% => OK
No of words: 277.0 407.700716846 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.51263537906 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37250868407 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 212.727598566 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5559566787 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 618.680645161 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.6003584229 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 99.099027664 48.9658058833 202% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 138.888888889 100.406767564 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7777777778 20.6045352989 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.4444444444 5.45110844103 247% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188067114867 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067820392246 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595159209743 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104508993065 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382501933751 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 58.1214874552 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.47 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 86.8835125448 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.