parents in the past had more influence in children's education
It is well-known that children's education is one of the biggest challenges for any parents. Some people think that parents are more committed to children's education these days. On the other hand, other people believe that parents played a more active role in children's behavior. If I were to choose one, I would prefer to go with the latter for many reasons.
First, working daily hours have increased in the last few years because people want to gain more money. Moreover, mothers have been included in this trend since they stopped doing home chores. For instance, my mother worked at home, and only my father worked in a company. Therefore, they controlled me, and consequently, I could only watch tv a few hours a day.
Second, following this idea further, parents established behavior rules such as homework time, bedtime, and free-time in the past. I believe these rules were a great opportunity to teach children about responsibility. For example, this technique was useful throughout my university time because I could do all my daily tasks. However, my oldest child is beginning school, and since I am working all day, I cannot explain to him the timetable benefits.
Finally, throughout my childhood, I could learn many things from my parents because we had more interactions with each other. However, with the advance of new technologies, this particular interaction has changed because children are more focused on video games, plus parents are tired after a lengthy job day. Unless this parent's behavior changes, this trend will continue in the next generations, becoming worse.
To sum up, children's education is a tough one because it needs parents who have to show compromise with their children. I am convinced that in the past, this commitment was better than it is today. There was more interaction between parents and children, parents worked fewer hours a day, and they established some basic rules useful for the children's future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ul throughout my university time because I could do all my daily tasks. However, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 322.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10248447205 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69119941654 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574534161491 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4917141951 48.9658058833 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.2777777778 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8888888889 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 5.45110844103 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305947332586 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961601594659 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0949661988806 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180206142056 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117598107783 0.0645574589148 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.