Question
Knowledge is an important part of our life. Some people prefer having deep knowledge about one particular subject, while others prefer having widespread knowledge about a variety of subjects. Which do you prefer and why?
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Make sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples.
Explanation & Recommendations
Model Answer
Idea Suggestions
Tips
This subject is usually wrangled about among individuals. It is not easy to concur or oppose this idea with any articulation without considering the persuasive reasons for the choice. Although some people may adamantly contends that it is beneficial to have a better understanding of just one subject; others may prioritize having expertise in a variety of knowledge. In my perspective, it is better to have command in a myriad of subjects. I have several reasons to support my point of view, which I will elaborate on in the subsequent paragraphs.
First and foremost, having expertise in a plethora of subjects broadens our career. To be more specific, if we specialize in different subjects chances are more likely we can get jobs in different fields. To explain broadly, if our graduation we could not find a job in our related field, and if we have study different subjects during our course of study, we can find a job in a variety of fields. My own experience demonstrates my opinion. When I was in the University, I had an option to study different subjects apart from my major. Although some students just went for just majors only, I had decided to go for a variety of subjects. Certainly, my major was pharmacology but I also Studied other subjects like medicinal chemistry, stats, maths, and history, When I finished my graduation, I had a hard time finding a job related to my field. Since I had studied other subjects as well, I decided to find a job-related to medicinal chemistry. luckily, I found a job in the quality control department in known pharmaceutical. Had I not studied a variety of subjects during my University, I would have had seen predicaments in my life and having difficulty finding a job in the pharmacology-related field.
On top of that, if we study a different variety of subjects we can change our major at any time. To be more specific, studying a variety of subjects provides us an opportunity to find the true love related to our study, We can change our major according to our interest in the subject. For Instance, When I was in college in the beginning my major was math. Nevertheless, after studying different subjects, I came to know I am not good at math and all these formulas and calculations, and I was more interested in biology. So, I decided to change my major to biology because I was very much into the human anatomy, physiology which are the core part of biology subjects. If I had not studied a variety of subjects during my college, I would have not found my field of Interest. This example proves my point of view that studying different subjects helps us to identify our area of interest and we can change our major accordingly.
In summation, from the above-mentioned discussion. I can say it is advantageous to study a variety of subjects. Because, it does not help us broaden our carrier and open the job opportunities for us, but is also assist us to find the area of interest related to our study.
Raw Score
3
/5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 948, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Luckily
...d a job-related to medicinal chemistry. luckily, I found a job in the quality control d...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 213, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'assisted'.
Suggestion: assisted
...e job opportunities for us, but is also assist us to find the area of interest related...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, may, nevertheless, so, well, apart from, for instance, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 75.0 43.0788530466 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 52.1666666667 150% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2478.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 524.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72900763359 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7844588288 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02096283012 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.43320610687 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 806.4 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.51792114695 313% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3159375222 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3076923077 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168303874713 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575198880171 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499647263311 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116900147057 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600346424988 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.