Question:
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Life is growing at a very fast pace. The developments in technology in every field is revolutionizing the entire world by making lives easy and comfortable due to vast scientific and technological research. Twenty years is a very long period when it comes to technological developments considering the alarming pace of developments happening around the world. The increasing technology not only is a boon to the mankind but also poses a huge threat. This is applicable to all the domains and even applicable to the automobile industry especially the cars. There would be a huge impact on the number of cars twenty years from now. In my view, there will be fewer cars in use than there is today because of environmental causes, over-congestion and increased public transport.
The first reason I propose to support the argument is the problem of over-congestion. Over congestion means when the traffic or cars are unable to move because of a large number of cars blocking the road. Since over the last 15 years the number of cars increased to such a high amount that it is almost a saturation because the road available to cars are much less than the number of cars and hence increased traffic jams. and in next five years the number of cars will oversaturate and after that people won't be able to drive cars on road because of high traffic and this will lead to a reduction in a number of cars for the next 10-15 years and the number will drastically go down. This decline has already begun for instance consider Bangalore, the traffic in Bangalore is enormous that it might take even 4-5 hours to travel 1.5 km and due to this traffic congestion, the number of cars drastically reduced by over 30% in last 5 years.
The second reason I state to support the argument is the environmental impacts of cars. Present day cars release greenhouse gases such as Carbon monoxide which is a very harmful pollutant as well. Increased air pollution and increased green house effect will cause global warming and the entire world would hold hand together to tackle such a big issue by reducing the number of vehicles. Similar happened in New Delhi when the air quality index in Delhi was very very high and also indicated the presence of pollutants. This was attributed to increased traffic and in winters it created smog and even days were much darker even in bright sunlight due to the presence of smog. So the Delhi Government took steps by introducing the odd-even policy in which one-day odd-numbered vehicles will move on the road and alternate day even. this reduction in a number of cars led to reduced pollution and improved environment of Delhi.
The third factor I would propose is the improvement in Public Transport by introducing busses, local trains, metro. For example, in the case of Kolkata coming up of Kolkata metro revolutionized the entire traffic which reduced the number of cars.
Therefore considering all these factors, I presume there will be fewer cars in the future than in use today.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...c or cars are unable to move because of a large number of cars blocking the road. Since over the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
... cars and hence increased traffic jams. and in next five years the number of cars w...
^^^
Line 5, column 460, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: very
...when the air quality index in Delhi was very very high and also indicated the presence of...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 833, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ove on the road and alternate day even. this reduction in a number of cars led to re...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ic which reduced the number of cars. Therefore considering all these factors, I presum...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, so, therefore, third, well, for example, for instance, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 52.1666666667 153% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2499.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 517.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.833655706 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76839952204 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75957250904 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47001934236 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 792.0 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3929613335 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.590909091 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04545454545 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151762578401 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513024205835 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659030082506 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10461156396 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0814292371027 0.0645574589148 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.