In some countries, people are no longer allowed to smoke in many public places and office buildings. Do you think this is a good rule or a bad rule? Use specific reasons and details to support your position.

Essay topics:

In some countries, people are no longer allowed to smoke in many public places and office buildings. Do you think this is a good rule or a bad rule? Use specific reasons and details to support your position.

This is a very debatable question. If we want to come up with some suitable answers to this question, we would need to look at the pros and the cons of this question, and then draw conclusions. Even then it would not be possible to directly answer. It would depend upon the kind of lifestyle we have, educational backgrounds, individual personalities and emotional concerns as well as the situation that we are in, and so forth.
In my opinion that smoking plays a negative role in everyone's life and career is an undeniable fact.
Should people realize the dangers of smoking in their life, they will ponder over it much more scrupulously.
These days, dangerous of smoking has recently been the topic of debate among psychologist and people in our province.
I do believe that people are have not to smoke in many public places and office buildings. There are a lot of different reasons with high value that support my point of view, and I would like to further illustrate a few of the most important ones in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, I want to mention one of the primary reasons that most doctors believe that smokers harm other people more than themselves. Doctors believe that smoke of cigarette is really harmful to every people who are breathing.
The second reason why I advocate this point of view lies in the fact that some people are allergic to smoke. In public places, we have different kinds of people who are allergic. Therefore, it is impolite if people do not regard themselves. We have to consider each other in public places.
Last but certainly not least, thinking about this question more meticulously, I would like to mention this point that thanks to smoke all things which are there will get a bad smell. A smell of cigaret or other smoke is really bad, and stable. As a result, people have to wash their cloth more than before. Smoker does not recognize the smell of cigarette, but people who are near will annoy.
Having discussed the issue from that point of view, I would rather look at it from another perspective as well. I think it is better than for smokers governors build a special place for smoking. In some restaurants smokers have special places a result they will not annoy other people.
By taking all above-mentioned arguments into consideration, the following conclusion can be drawn about the issue. Underestimating the advantages of smoking in people's life is not logical. Attending to this issue meticulously contributes to understanding dangerous of smoke, and can improve several aspects of personal as well as social life

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t it from another perspective as well. I think it is better than for smokers gove...
^^
Line 10, column 310, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...moke, and can improve several aspects of personal as well as social life
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, really, second, so, then, therefore, well, kind of, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2152.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 444.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84684684685 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70907656824 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518018018018 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 675.0 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1751775337 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.08 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.76 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 10.0 4.53405017921 221% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200440575991 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625383551001 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064042254783 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0845392872493 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543524765284 0.0645574589148 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.