Some people think that the government should use extra money to fund programs to improve the environment Others think that it is better for the government to spend money to support artistic programs Which option do you prefer Use specific reasons and exam

Essay topics:

Some people think that the government should use extra money to fund programs to improve the environment. Others think that it is better for the government to spend money to support artistic programs. Which option do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

It is critical improtant for the government to use the money effficient because the budget is limited. Some people might hold that the government should use the extra money to improve the environment. Others may think it is better to put money into the artistic programs. Personally, I agree wit the former advice. There are two main reasons which I will explore in my following essay.

To begin with, improve the environment could improve the life quality. If the factories nearby generate lots of harmful gases to the air and cause serious air polution problems. Spending extra money to deal these problems could definitely brings more benefits to local communities. My experience is a good illustration of this. Ten years ago, my hometown has a terrible air pollution. The factories keep emission their byproducts into air. Sometimes, the sky in my community is cloudy, not because of the weather, it is caused by the factories. Lots of my neighbors got the lung cancer or even passed away. When the government noticed this problem, they spend their extra money to improve the facilities in factories and established strict rules to restrict the emissions. In this case, my communities are no long need to tolerate the horrible air condition and having healthier life quality.

Secondly, improve the environment needs more fundings than the artistic programs. There are always enormous private sponsors spend significant money in artistic programs and hold some events in communities. On the other hand, less company wants to donate their money to improve the environment. For example, the rescue of the endanger animals are the top priority of the government nowadays. The government has more resources to deal with this problem. There are lots of specialize and top-notch experts and researchers working for the government figuring out the methods to cope with the issues of rescuing the endangered species. Moreover, the process of recovering these species could be more simple for the government to launch. In this way, I think the responsibility of the environment should be taken by the government.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that the government should spend the extra money to improve the environment. Not only because it can level up the living qualities of some districts, but also it needs more funding and complex process in improving it.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'bring'
Suggestion: bring
...to deal these problems could definitely brings more benefits to local communities. My ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 360, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'terrible air pollution'.
Suggestion: terrible air pollution
...of this. Ten years ago, my hometown has a terrible air pollution. The factories keep emission their bypr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 323, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...environment. For example, the rescue of the endanger animals are the top priority of the gov...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, i think, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1988.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 384.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17708333333 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79992850076 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528645833333 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9183961885 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.52 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.36 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368069241424 0.236089414692 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937529491217 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0945645015106 0.0737576698707 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243486573333 0.150856017488 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117189677044 0.0645574589148 182% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.17 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.