Some universities require students to take classes in many subjects. Other universities require students to specialize in one subject. Which is better?
Universities play an important role in shaping students' future life. They have their own policies which determine the content of education. Some universities require students to choose many subjects while others encourage students to specialize just in one subject. As far as I'm concerned, it is a better choice to take classes in several subjects for the following reasons:
First, students will have the opportunity to broaden their scope of knowledge. There are a lot of professors in universities who are the best in their field. Why shouldn't students use their knowledge? Why should student get stuck in a certain subject? Taking different courses makes them familiar with a variety of different sciences and helps them expand their mind and think widely and develop innovative ideas. For example, one of my friends took some courses in archaeology while his primary major was computer programming. At beginning, he just was interested in archaeology and didn't think about it seriously, but it helped him to come up with the idea of developing new software which could facilitate the documentation of archaeological findings. He consulted his professor about the idea. The professor said that it was exactly what archaeologists need. He developed the software and could sell it to a company at good price. Without taking an archaeology class he would never have developed such software.
Secondly, taking courses in several subjects will provide students with more job opportunities. They can try different fields and choose the one that they are interested in the most. If they cannot succeed in achieving their goals in a field they can switch to another. More importantly, employers, today, seek for versatile employees who can perform various duties. Take my friend, Kaveh, for example, although his main major at university was business management, he took part in computer science, English language and psychology classes. After finishing university he started his career in a commercial company, specializing in computer parts, as a low rank employee who did only routine tasks such as answering phones or making arrangements for meetings, however, after only a few months his boss delegated part of her work to him. Since he had enough knowledge in computer as well as acceptable English fluency to make contact with foreign customers, could handle the functions well and shortly after that he was promoted. Now he is the manager of foreign commercial department. As you can see, having knowledge in different subjects can be useful for making progress and getting job promotions.
To sum up, I believe that taking classes in different subjects and gaining knowledge in various fields is certainly better. Students who have taken classes in many subjects will be more successful in their career and can develop great ideas. Consequently, universities should encourage their students to take classes in a number of subjects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...ecialize just in one subject. As far as Im concerned, it is a better choice to tak...
^^
Line 2, column 163, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...es who are the best in their field. Why shouldnt students use their knowledge? Why shoul...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 585, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... just was interested in archaeology and didnt think about it seriously, but it helped...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e that they are interested in the most. If they cannot succeed in achieving their ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2473.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 469.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27292110874 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87674907406 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53091684435 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 757.8 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9405647435 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1153846154 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0384615385 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319273959218 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900728011622 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124351568056 0.0737576698707 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265712162287 0.150856017488 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.174588222822 0.0645574589148 270% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.