Sometimes filmmakers make movies that are based on books. When a movie is based on a book, some people prefer to read the book before watching the movie. Other people prefer to read the book only after they have watched the movie. Which do you prefer and why?
That in today’s world, the ways which films and books can influence on individuals is an axiom. Filmmakers and authors implement various approaches in order to make their work impressive. A question, which is a matter of debate, a controversial one, is, whether, it is better to watch a film which is based on a book, after reading the book or before. Although it is a bit little hard to reach a consensus on this issue, I am to a great extent on the belief that watching the film before reading the book is an invaluable experiment. The following reasons would elaborate more on the thesis.
To commence, one of the compelling reasons that justifies the thesis is that the importance of the movie on people’s understanding of the book. To put it in general words, a great film can impressively transfer the meaning of a book. Simply stated, the most illustrious books has have special words which sometimes comprehending them is not easily attained. Needless to say that a film is a certain way that can reinforce imagines images of the book. Going into the depth, reading a book after watching the movie which is based on a book, can increase the speed of reading the book and saves one’s time. To shed more light on the issue, according to the result of a study posted in Time Magazine, when a movie is based on a book, it can facilitate the meaning of the book drastically if the film is watched before reading the book.
Alongside with the first reason elaborated above, watching a film can be deemed a joyful activity which even easily impresses the inner layer of individuals. To clarify, each scene of a film instills all the emotions which an author tended to show by words. Broadly speaking, watching a fabulous movie can transfer the message of a book without serving much energy. It is all transparent that if before a book is read a film which is based on it, is watched, it can be more attractive. However, what I mentioned above might not be overgeneralized to all contexts, there are some films which can never strongly express a book. Nevertheless, they are more of an exception rather than a general rule.
Drawing upon the reasons, although there are always some exceptions which are excluded from the general rule, I do agree that watching a movie can be more novelty if we do not know about it much. To recapitulate the reasons, if we watch a film which is based on a book, after reading the book, not only can it help us to understand the book without any doubts but also after reading its story certainly watching is boring.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
... stated, the most illustrious books has have special words which sometimes comprehen...
^^^^
Line 5, column 592, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put before the verb 'can'.
Suggestion: never can
...ll contexts, there are some films which can never strongly express a book. Nevertheless, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 699, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n exception rather than a general rule. Drawing upon the reasons, although there...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 424, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...its story certainly watching is boring.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, broadly speaking, in general, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2119.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 455.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65714285714 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7361975366 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472527472527 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 663.3 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2066190097 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.526315789 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9473684211 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42105263158 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395495371173 0.236089414692 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137049619184 0.076458572812 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107520966544 0.0737576698707 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279671686552 0.150856017488 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074121351516 0.0645574589148 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.