These days, people enjoy a lot of time away from their work and school obligations. Many people use this time to visit new places and learn about them. What do you think is the best way to learn about a place you are visiting for the first time?
Having extra time to visit new places, as we all know, for the majority of people, regarding social stratification, is considered as an achievement of the industrial revolution. Due to its paramount importance, efforts for evaluating its effectiveness have always been among the top priorities of sociologists. In this regard, many people support this opinion that the best way to learn about a place when a person visits it for the first time is local tour guides. Similarly to common belief, I believe that besides the local guides, the websites would be crucial as well. I will delve into two conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my standpoint.
The first reason that makes me hold the belief that use websites have noticeable effects on the familiarity of a person about a place is widespread using the internet all around the world. Undoubtedly, people, even in isolated and distant countries, have much more access to the internet than individuals have in the past. So, evidently, using the website for getting information has become more popular. To illustrate, the public, fortunately, does not look at social media as a hobby; rather, they seize this opportunity to gain information in every aspect they interested in, like travel to the specific destination. Scientifically speaking, many people who come to the identified place for the first time, use the websites that belong to the place. Although many critics may challenge this idea and debate that these websites can be decisive, the public points of view toward these media show different attitudes.
Another equally noteworthy reason to bear in mind is the positive role of local tour guides on the familiarity one can gain from a place. Needless to say, for the majority of people, the best informative person in every destination is who lives in a certain area as residents. Moreover, they believe that a resident as a tour guide can bring the legends and stories which are common among natives and provide positive effects about the area on the travelers. What would happen if the guide was a nonresident, a commuter who just worked in a specific place for his or her job? The amount of information a local guide can provide or the influence of a location on passengers will reduce. Take my personal experience as an example. A couple of years ago, when I was a little younger than now, I used to travel a lot. Once, one of the friends of mine proposed me to go to the place that I have never seen before, and she tried to hire a local guide for the whole trip. The result was amazing. I earn a lot of information in comparison with the time I had traveled with my own information to a place. In addition, based on the sagas I had heard, I became enthusiastic to know more about that place. Therefore, not only the information but also the excitement a local guide can convey will convince the passengers in the future to travel to the place even for the second time.
To summarize, contemplating all remarks, we can safely conclude that both local guides help and websites are the two of the best ways to get familiar with the place.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 467, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...or the first time is local tour guides. Similarly to common belief, I believe that beside...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, look, may, moreover, regarding, second, similarly, so, therefore, thus, well, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2591.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 538.0 407.700716846 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81598513011 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81610080973 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77015785598 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501858736059 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 851.4 618.680645161 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9458467474 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.958333333 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271467862937 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727647995766 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946294259979 0.0737576698707 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161149190415 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666928849921 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.