TPO 49Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons

Essay topics:

TPO 49
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

There have been some moot points about whether keeping friendships with a small number of people over a long period is more important for happiness or making new friends. The question of this issue has aroused as a subject of controversy among academicians. When it comes to my position, by weighing up the pros and cons, I strongly subscribe to the point that maintaining friendships is more important for our pleasure. I have some reasons, the most outstanding of which will be explicated in the ensuing paragraphs.
The first reason worth discussing here is that due to a great relationship between old friends, there is very strong intimacy among these kinds of friendship, therefore, old friends can bring joyful sense for each other easily. As a case to the viewpoint, I vividly remember, when I departed to military service, I had a difficult and tedious day in that place. One day when I was a guard in guns room, I visited my old friend who makes huge happiness for me. Mahdi and I have a great friendship since high school. He was one of the most important patrons for me in those days. Thus, visiting Mahdi on military service helped me to spend that difficult day easily. My personal experience competently corroborates to the point that maintaining old friends is very significant for our pleasure.
By the same token, another paramount reason to be mentioned here is that olds friends know our foibles and negative behaviors which lead to support us in the arduous conditions. Among old friends, there are many expectations which we can not see between new friends. As a consequence, old friendships cover our foibles and try to solve our problems in each condition. My personal example demonstrates this reality, due to the bad economic situation and recession, I could not take insurance for my car. Two months ago, I had a terrible car crash which leads to damages. Owing to lacked insurance, I had to compensate for the damages by myself. Hence I had not this amount of money and I forced to sell my car. In this situation, Mahdi, who I introduced him in the aforementioned reason, borrowed me some money which helps me to compensate for the damages. My personal example shed some light to the point that old friends help us in an arduous situation which we can not expect from new friends.
To wrap the argument up, I reiterate that maintaining old friendships is very remarkable for my happiness. These persons not only bring us much cheerful sense but also help us in various situations.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
... about whether keeping friendships with a small number of people over a long period is more impor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 644, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...o compensate for the damages by myself. Hence I had not this amount of money and I fo...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, by the same token

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2081.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80600461894 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82370886757 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517321016166 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1718648816 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5909090909 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6818181818 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.04545454545 5.45110844103 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193668576527 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553547280168 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722143078362 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131100740624 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675839845854 0.0645574589148 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.