TPO-50
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some voices claim that college should educate young people about the history of various subjects as a primary course whatever department they are majoring in. It is such an excellent idea. History should be studied because it is essential to students and to society, and because it harbors beauty. There are many ways to discuss the real functions of the subject-as there are many historical talents and many paths to historical meaning. All definitions of history’s utility, however, rely on two fundamental facts.
To begin with, history helps students to understand better in their studying while providing a storehouse of information about how the change of community, nation, and the world. Interdisciplinary is an especially critical motif for contemporary academia, so the construction of knowledge is multiple and hard to understand if students do not recognize the substantial relationship between historical information and the newest study. For instance, their creation would get into an awkward situation if art students could not find the relationship between New Media Art and the development of art history; although they built a tempting visual image of their artwork, yet the narrative inside is usually barren. The gap between poor storytelling and art history would cause miserable experiences for audiences.
Furthermore, history helps students develop critical thinking skills. The evolution of human history is serpentine; it does not follow a straight line. People have preconceived notions of the past from simple lessons in childhood, and those notions are usually rough. Advanced history courses at universities offer an opportunity for them to rethink the evolution of human history. It provides another perspective for young people considering historical movements which teach them how to criticize the Social, Economic, Religious, Cultural, and so on. How to criticize the Korean War in the last century? There’s no standard answer anymore. Students can learn how to answer the question multiple; for example, to consider external factors from the other powerful countries and internal factors from the deconstruction of the Korean kingdom.
In conclusion, studying History is excellent at developing attributes of life, and it provides youths with curiosity and creativity to understand the world. Therefore, it is crucial for higher education institutions to make history courses obligatory for their students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...owever, rely on two fundamental facts. To begin with, history helps students to...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e miserable experiences for audiences. Furthermore, history helps students deve...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... deconstruction of the Korean kingdom. In conclusion, studying History is excel...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2091.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65135135135 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04261070667 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578378378378 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7370317304 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.052631579 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4736842105 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16338732226 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515923094666 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416690142865 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0999353956047 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0128659503344 0.0645574589148 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 58.1214874552 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 10.9000537634 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.