Tpo 53
The reading asserts that Imposing high taxes on cigarette smokers and people who eat unhealthy foods have several social benefits. The lecturer, however, finds the idea dubious and casts doubt on the reasons proposed by the reading passage.
The author argues that high taxes dissuade people from buying detrimental products such as cigarette and unhealthy foods, and these taxes will cause them to smoke less and eat less unhealthy foods. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that if the taxes rise, people who smoke will buy cheaper cigarette which has lower quality and give rise to higher risks for them. Besides, if the amount of taxes increase for unhealthy foods, it will take a drastic toll on people who earn less money, and they will have lower money to buy healthier foods.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that these types of taxes are fair in view of the fact that people who smoke or eat deleterious foods will create high medical costs, so it is not fair that people who follow healthy diet and don't smoke pay the same for the mentioned costs. On the contrary, the professor underlies the fact that some people believe that it is unfair that poor and rich people pay the same taxes for their smoking. Moreover, imposing such taxes on people who don't earn enough money and eat unhealthy food will exert pressure on them, so it is not fair.
Finally, the reading asserts that obliging people to pay these taxes will raise government revenue, and government can spend collected money on building public facilities, including public parks, stadiums and public education. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that force people to pay these taxes will create millions of dollars for government, so governments become dependent on these money. Therefore, they don't want to lose these money. Consequently, they may disregard enacting some prohibitive rules against people who have unhealthy habits not to lose that money. For instance, they may let smokers smoke in public places.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...asons proposed by the reading passage. The author argues that high taxes dissuade ...
^^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...that people who follow healthy diet and dont smoke pay the same for the mentioned co...
^^^^
Line 3, column 490, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...over, imposing such taxes on people who dont earn enough money and eat unhealthy foo...
^^^^
Line 4, column 409, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'these moneys', 'these monies'?
Suggestion: this money; these moneys; these monies
...ent, so governments become dependent on these money. Therefore, they dont want to lose thes...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 438, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...pendent on these money. Therefore, they dont want to lose these money. Consequently,...
^^^^
Line 4, column 456, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'these moneys', 'these monies'?
Suggestion: this money; these moneys; these monies
...oney. Therefore, they dont want to lose these money. Consequently, they may disregard enact...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, conversely, finally, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in contrast, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 52.1666666667 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 340.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00294117647 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33317246933 2.67179642975 87% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488235294118 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 510.3 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.1512695061 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.846153846 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1538461538 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6153846154 5.45110844103 213% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.