TPO 55
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is critically important we can comprehend the problems and issues during projects. Needless to say, making practical communication with colleagues and classmates to do projects in the perfect way is one of the vital demands. Some people prefer to make contact about works by e-mails, while others opt to communicate in person. In my opinion, the person connection is the best way to work on projects practically. I feel in this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, person communication prevents misunderstanding and provides a better comprehension of colleagues' opinions. My personal experience is a copeling illustration of this. When I worked on my project about designing an application for Hydrogeology, I needed to work with a colleague who was a software engineer. I sent some e-mail to explain a concept about groundwater, but he could understand it. When I met him at the university and explained the concept again to him, he totally Understood.
The other reason that pops up in my mind is that in close and person communication people can ask more question and also answer most of the others' questions in the short time that is mean they may save the amount of time in this way. Let's imagine two students who work on projects for their class and each of them takes responsibility for a special part of it. They have constant times during weeks for meetings. In those meetings, they ask all their questions about others' outputs and solve their confusion in just 2 hours. therefore, In that way, they save a numerous amount of time to do the important works for the project.
In conclusion, I strongly feel that person communication is a better way to do teamwork projects. This is because it helps to convey our mean better, and saving time by decreasing the time of sending e-mails and waiting to receive the responses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is critically important we can compre...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...I will explore in the following essay. To begin with, person communication prev...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t again to him, he totally Understood. The other reason that pops up in my mind...
^^^
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...ay save the amount of time in this way. Lets imagine two students who work on projec...
^^^^
Line 3, column 528, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
... solve their confusion in just 2 hours. therefore, In that way, they save a numerous amou...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o the important works for the project. In conclusion, I strongly feel that pers...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, may, so, therefore, while, i feel, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 321.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85981308411 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95706408888 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548286604361 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6705048579 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7647058824 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8823529412 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23529411765 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30816329799 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.097151955979 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606335124858 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179716916031 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473629669162 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.