you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Throughout the history friendship has been always an inevitable and crucial part of
people's lives since it has conspicuous effects on different aspects of life such as feelings, emotions and happiness of people to number just a few. With this in mind, many believe that people having handful friends for a long time are happier than those who have many friends temporarily, while others believe otherwise and emphasis the role of making new friends readily on happiness. I, personally, subscribe to the former group for quite a few reasons which are as follow.
First of all, people who make just a few friends, they consider their tastes and characteristics at first and choose people whose personalities are similar and they have a lot in common to talk about and spend their time. By this I mean, people who choose friends with the same view points and tastes are able to have enjoyable time together. To consistent with this idea, such people continue their relationships for a long period of time since they become satisfied about sharing their time with whom they understand them and have their company in every aspects of life from difficulties and sadness to joys and successes.
Another equally momentous reason that should be mentioned is that people who have this level of tact to save their limited number of friends for a long time, they cherish the concept of friendship and other relationships. In other words, these people ponder their friends' personalities and circumstances that they are encounter. Consequently, they become helpful and reliable people who have self-satisfaction that lead happiness and joyful in their lives. Since they are responsible towards their friends and whose feelings and the more they become prosperous in their jobs, the happier they are. It is psychologically proved that those who take care of their friends and sake to protect their friendships from misunderstandings and conflicts have stable personalities and the happier, they are as an imperative result.
In conclusion, according to the facts that are discussed above, I firmly hold this opinion that ones who have prolonged restricted friendships are more pleased and happy I their lives since not only do they communicate with people who are similar to them, but also they valuate the importance of their friends’ positions in their life and feel more satisfaction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...always an inevitable and crucial part of peoples lives since it has conspicuous e...
^^^
Line 2, column 467, Rule ID: AS_FOLLOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as follows'?
Suggestion: as follows
...group for quite a few reasons which are as follow. First of all, people who make just a ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to people'
Suggestion: to people
...and characteristics at first and choose people whose personalities are similar and the...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 425, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...continue their relationships for a long period of time since they become satisfied about shari...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, so, while, i mean, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1998.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16279069767 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8655223974 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503875968992 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.1344086022 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.9118266731 48.9658058833 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.5 100.406767564 166% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.25 20.6045352989 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 5.45110844103 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209470912481 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962629123643 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548242611323 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130726408547 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747672286945 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 11.7677419355 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.1575268817 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.24 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.0537634409 147% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.