You are helping to select a leader for a student organization or club. Do you agree or disagree that a person’s honesty is the most important thing to consider in deciding whom to vote for? Use reasons and examples to support your position.
There are some moot points about choosing a leader for students club. The question of whether the most important aspect of these persons is honesty or not has aroused as a subject of controversy among academicians. When it comes to my position, I strongly subscribe that honesty is the most significant factors for this person. I have some reasons, the most outstanding of which will be explicated in the ensuing paragraphs.
The first reason worth discussing here is that honesty is a remarkable aspect of humans when someone is an honest person, we can trust this person. Leadership is very sensitive and we can not choose a leader without know this leader very well. Therefore, if an individual can prove his or her honesty, he or she will be the best choice for leadership. As a case to the point I vividly remember, when I was a student in the high school, we have a football team which wants to participate in schools competitions. In that team, we needed a person as a leader because he should give everyone duty in the right manner. We chose our top student for leadership but he was not an honest person and selected his friends for each game. Consequently, our team experienced some conflicts due to leaders dishonesty. My personal experience competently corroborates to the point that honesty is very momentous for each leader.
By the same token, another paramount reason to be mentioned here is that honest persons can concentrate on their duties and doing everything very well. To be more specific, honest people have not any deception hence, their mind only focuses on their jobs. My personal example demonstrates this reality when I was a student at university we had a site investigation project. In that project, six members participated in finishing the work. We needed an honest person who reintegrates everything. Because this project was very important for our grade. Thus we chose Mahdi who was very sedulous and honest. Mahdi leads our project did in the best way and had not any obstacle. My personal example shed some light to the point that it is very significant for each organization to have an honest leader.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned reasons, I reiterate that honesty has a considerable impact on the leadership. Because, not only lead to team alliance but also, reintegrate to everything very well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
...ut choosing a leader for students club. The question of whether the most important aspect of these pers...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 550, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...oject was very important for our grade. Thus we chose Mahdi who was very sedulous an...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, well, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1958.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.895 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87478260048 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4975 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 622.8 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2474724876 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1304347826 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3913043478 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78260869565 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204347204963 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661638190298 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590124540368 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129436295154 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750060958089 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.