TPO-49
The lecture forcibly contradicts what is argued in the reading material. According to the passage, some scientists maintain that whales' brain has a high degree of complexity and it provides whales a high intelligence and well-developed abstract system to help them navigate in open ocean. Nevertheless, the professor asserts that closer scrutiny of the argument would display how flimsy it is. He, in turn, presents several evidences to demonstrate his statement.
To begin with, the professor casts doubt on the theory by contending that there is no direct connection between using stars to navigation and high intelligence. Although the animal likes ducks have an ability of star navigation, ducks do not have high intelligence. Thus, this point undoubtedly forms a striking contrast with the authors'.
Furthermore, the author affirms that whales can migrate in straight lines due to an ability of relying on stars at night which can provide them as external signs. On the contrary, the professor stands in stark opposition and counterattacks the viewpoint by expounding that whales exploit one instinct function called biomagnetic to sense earth field and biomagnetic can help them swim in straight line. Hence, the claim of the author is virtually indefensible and does not hold water.
Last but not least, the passage may be plausible that there is a function called spy-hopping can provide whales information to navigate. Nonetheless, one critical point is left out of consideration. Pointed out by the professor, actually, spy-hopping is nothing to do with navigation. The professor declares that all of the comments are merely speculation. Consequently, the author's claim is untenable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 314, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...navigation. The professor declares that all of the comments are merely speculation. Conse...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 344, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ares that all of the comments are merely speculation. Consequently, the authors c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, furthermore, hence, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, thus, well, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 264.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45075757576 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07706113218 2.5805825403 119% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617424242424 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.3763543814 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9333333333 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275549546182 0.272083759551 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711134010645 0.0996497079465 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881634108569 0.0662205650399 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149371130695 0.162205337803 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406429928315 0.0443174109184 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.