TPO-49 - Integrated Writing Task
The passage concerns the technics that the whales employ to navigate. It proposes that the whales navigate their way by stars, like early human sailors. On the other hand, the professor states that this hypothesize seems fascinating but the reasons are not convincing enough. In what follows, the reasons for disagreement of professor will be explained.
First of all, the passage asserted that the whales enjoy a powerful brain that able them to navigate their way through the stars. On the other hand, the professor gave an example of ducks that do not possess such a complex brain but they can navigate their way by stars. He said that these features may be an instinctive feature.
Second, the passage believes that animals maintain their movement in a straight direction for a long distance by helping of an external force that they sense, so for the whales that can rely on a specific external force, the stars are the external force that may help them to maintain their movement. On the other hand, the professor believes that the whales utilize this ability too. He stipulates that there is an organ in the brain of whales that senses the magnetic field and they maintain their movement through sensing the magnetic field.
Third, the spy-hopping behavior of whales is known as a reason for their navigation through stars by the passage. On the contrary, the professor is of the opinion that it is not a unique feature in the whales. He stated that the sharks also develope this features. The sharks are one of those animals that do not migrate and they use this behavior to detect the possible preys, so it does not necessarily mean that the whales use this behavior to see the stars in order to navigate their way.
In a nutshell, the professor believes that this theory is a pure speculation that needs more investigation and more convincing reasons.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, third, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 22.412803532 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 320.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85625 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48871672504 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45 0.540411800872 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 475.2 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.3395851885 49.2860985944 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.6 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381887598316 0.272083759551 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12124328556 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858862573078 0.0662205650399 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195775359878 0.162205337803 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107030213247 0.0443174109184 242% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.