Extreme sports like skiing, water rafting etc are dangerous and should be banned. Agree or disagree?
Since past time, adventure games like skiing and water rafting are part of adequate entertainment. Some people believe that adventure games are dangerous and must be banned and other people argue that these courageous games must be exists and should be played withing limit of safety measures. In this essay, I shall discuss both views by analyzing this argument and explore a logical conclusion.
To start with, there are myriad and multifarious reasons which state that skiing and water rafting provide a package of entertainment and boldness. One of them is exploring yourself with challenges while playing these games. Team spirit, leadership and co-ordination are the main reason to pursue these games. While taking participate in river rafting competition, contestants show their skills and talent. These days there are so many measures and safety regulation under which these games are potentially worth.
On contrary people argue that these games are hazardous and can be prejudice and fatal for life of participants. It is also argued that some participants play skiing and water rafting without any safety measures and breach play zone spot. It can be measured some people do not use escort and result into drown or fatal death. In absence of precautions and abundance of measure safety these games lead to banned by regime of local region.
In recapitulate, there are strong arguments for playing these games. In my personal opinion, I believe the notion to say that it must not banned and more precaution must be in place to enjoy these games. I would recommend regime should scrutiny the spot of these games.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
Since past time, adventure games like skiing and water ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment and explore a logical conclusion. To start with, there are myriad and mult...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ich these games are potentially worth. On contrary people argue that these game...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to banned by regime of local region. In recapitulate, there are strong argume...
^^
Line 4, column 71, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...rong arguments for playing these games. In my personal opinion, I believe the noti...
^^
Line 4, column 77, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...rguments for playing these games. In my personal opinion, I believe the notion to say that it mu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 8.36945812808 227% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1320754717 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60900213347 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3593709594 50.4703680194 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6666666667 104.977214359 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.26666666667 7.25397266985 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124386937043 0.242375264174 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422738732753 0.0925447433944 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451316960712 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0808447029177 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478276653195 0.0609392437508 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 12.6369458128 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.