Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. Only about 2 percent of customers have complained, indicating that an average of 98 people out of 100 are happy with the change. Furthermore, many servers have reported that a number of customers who ask for butter do not complain when they are given margarine instead. Clearly, either these customers cannot distinguish butter from margarine or they use the term 'butter' to refer to either butter or margarine. Thus, we predict that Happy Pancake House will be able to increase profits dramatically if we extend this cost-saving change to all our restaurants in the southeast and northeast as well.
In the argument the author conclude that the butter is referred to as either butter or margarine by the customer resulting be help full to increase the profits by using margarine as a butter for Happy Pancake House entire the world. This conclusion contain many assumptions on which the author had not provided any fix evidence and so the desired result many not be pretended. there are many flow in the author conclusion and due to that only the result many not be assumed.
Firstly, the author said that the butter is replaced by the margarine tin the entire southwestern United State of the Happy Pancake restaurants. And hat result in to arise in that complain of only 2 percent of the consumer of the restaurants that 98 out of 100 people were happy with the change of butter with the margarine but this will cause a flow that who are they 2 percent of the customer to decide this result of all 98 people out of 100. And this will not be stated on the bases of their result that all more of the customer will like that change.
Secondly, the author stated that many servers reported that the many people who asking for the butter is not comlaning if they were given the margarine insted of that. This will not result into that the all customer will not find any difference between both of them. But that can be predected that the customers will agree if the get margarine insted of butter.
Thirdly, the author stated that if the customer is not stating any difference between the two if the margarine is given insted of the butter then they can get more benefits form this and can generate more profit due to this but this assumptions is is not supported with any kind of fix evidance and so can not be stated to be true for all the time. And so the author can not pretend to be true.
Finally, the author stated that this will resukt in to more beneficial and so can ne cerid out in the whole country but this was been the result of the southwestern United state and so can not remane same for the whole contery and by this rasons the author conclusion can not be the one as stated earlier
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: Secondly, the author stated that many servers reported that the many people who asking for the butter is not comlaning if they were given the margarine insted of that.
Error: comlaning Suggestion: commanding
Error: insted Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: But that can be predected that the customers will agree if the get margarine insted of butter.
Error: predected Suggestion: predicted
Error: insted Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: Thirdly, the author stated that if the customer is not stating any difference between the two if the margarine is given insted of the butter then they can get more benefits form this and can generate more profit due to this but this assumptions is is not supported with any kind of fix evidance and so can not be stated to be true for all the time.
Error: evidance Suggestion: evidence
Error: insted Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: Finally, the author stated that this will resukt in to more beneficial and so can ne cerid out in the whole country but this was been the result of the southwestern United state and so can not remane same for the whole contery and by this rasons the author conclusion can not be the one as stated earlier
Error: resukt Suggestion: result
Error: ne Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: rasons Suggestion: reasons
Error: contery Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: cerid Suggestion: card
Error: remane Suggestion: No alternate word
===============
flaws:
some sentences are too long.
--------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 10 2
No. of Sentences: 11 15
No. of Words: 389 350
No. of Characters: 1689 1500
No. of Different Words: 142 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.441 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.342 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.232 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 112 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 63 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 44 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 25 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 35.364 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 18.864 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.727 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.442 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.698 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.167 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'contains'.
Suggestion: contains
...House entire the world. This conclusion contain many assumptions on which the author ha...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 378, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...e desired result many not be pretended. there are many flow in the author conclusion ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 388, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun flow seems to be countable; consider using: 'many flows'.
Suggestion: many flows
...result many not be pretended. there are many flow in the author conclusion and due to tha...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...given the margarine insted of that. This will not result into that the all custo...
^^
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sted of that. This will not result into that the all customer will not find any ...
^^
Line 7, column 229, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...an generate more profit due to this but this assumptions is is not supported with an...
^^^^
Line 7, column 246, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: is
...profit due to this but this assumptions is is not supported with any kind of fix evid...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 126, Rule ID: WAS_BEEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'was' or 'has been'?
Suggestion: was; has been
...cerid out in the whole country but this was been the result of the southwestern United ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... was been the result of the southwestern United state and so can not remane same ...
^^
Line 9, column 306, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion can not be the one as stated earlier
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.6327345309 112% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.9520958084 116% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 11.1786427146 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 13.6137724551 140% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 28.8173652695 111% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 55.5748502994 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 16.3942115768 30% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 2260.96107784 76% => OK
No of words: 389.0 441.139720559 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.42673521851 5.12650576532 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27068697164 2.78398813304 82% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 204.123752495 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.365038560411 0.468620217663 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 545.4 705.55239521 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59920159681 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 19.7664670659 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.8473053892 140% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.5412902152 57.8364921388 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.5 119.503703932 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.4166666667 23.324526521 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 5.70786347227 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.25449101796 190% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 6.88822355289 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19876440735 0.218282227539 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924251814763 0.0743258471296 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0996000607899 0.0701772020484 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128358761098 0.128457276422 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11306443961 0.0628817314937 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.3799401198 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 48.3550499002 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.197005988 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.01 12.5979740519 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.32208582834 90% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 98.500998004 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 12.3882235529 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.1389221557 133% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.