In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In any field of inquiry, A beginner looks at an issue from a different perspective from a expert. Though they look at the issues in a new perspective, most of the issues need experience for the resolve. Experince matters in many of the factors to be considered in an inquiry. So, I can't concur with the agreement that the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
In situations, where we need quick resolve, experience plays a key role. A beginner is new to the inquiry and he might not have faced any real issues. A beginner needs a lot of time to analyze and interpret the things. Things may get worse in this brief period while a beginner is still in analyzing and interpreting the things. It is difficult for a beginner to easily grasp the key points to be noted in an inquiry. An expert, who already worked in many inquiries, can quickly highlight the key points which are helpful in resolving the issue. Expert can grasp the things and interpret them at the same time. To acquire this skill, it takes a lot of time for a beginner to spend in inquiries. So, an expert will have quick resolve compared to a beginner.
In situations, where past experience untangles the deadlocks in an inquiry, expert makes important contributions. A beginner may not have any idea how to proceed in a particular situation. He was stopped by an logical block where he can neither proceed in the inquiry nor return to the intial stage. At this stage, an expert can recollect his past experiences and make key contributions to the inquiry. This past experience wisdom is not available for the beginner. In these situations, the contribution provided by a beginner is minimal compared to an expert.
I acknowledge that some problems have to be addressed in a new perspective and a fresh thinking is needed to resolve such kind of problems. But it can't be conclued that a beginner is more likely than expert to make important contributions. Because most of the problems require experts also to resolve. For example. a student has invented a new way to move an automobile efficiently with less amount of fuel. Definitely, he must have used old methods and experts' knowledge in that field.
In any field of inquiry, the expert is more likely than the beginner to make important contributions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... issue from a different perspective from a expert. Though they look at the issues...
^^
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ssue from a different perspective from a expert. Though they look at the issues ...
^
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...s to be considered in an inquiry. So, I cant concur with the agreement that the begi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 22, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
... to a beginner. In situations, where past experience untangles the deadlocks in an inquiry, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...particular situation. He was stopped by an logical block where he can neither proc...
^^
Line 5, column 344, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...this stage, an expert can recollect his past experiences and make key contributions to the inqui...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 409, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
... key contributions to the inquiry. This past experience wisdom is not available for the beginne...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 148, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...o resolve such kind of problems. But it cant be conclued that a beginner is more lik...
^^^^
Line 7, column 148, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
...o resolve such kind of problems. But it cant be conclued that a beginner is more lik...
^^^^
Line 7, column 241, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...expert to make important contributions. Because most of the problems require experts al...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 316, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
...e experts also to resolve. For example. a student has invented a new way to move ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, still, while, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1916.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 402.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76616915423 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86768775818 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.445273631841 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 615.6 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.8266008915 60.3974514979 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.64 118.986275619 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.08 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.56 5.21951772744 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231851101833 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790378433046 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0942162994003 0.0758088955206 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193526901326 0.150359130593 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11436408695 0.0667264976115 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 14.1392134831 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.