In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. I

Essay topics:

In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Whether a begginner has a higher chance to make a significant progress in any field of human activity, or at least some experience is required to contribute to the accummulation of knowledge? While I agree that the history is deplete with evidence of unexpected discoveries, I still doubt that these discoveries and contributions are made without any experience in the given field of study.

An expert, in any area of inquiry, apart of knowledge possesse an experience, allowing him to make correct decisions and thus, progress in the field. For example, if we compare an experienced doctor versus a novice intern, it might come aparent that both of them are able to easily spot the disease and prescribe a proper treatment. What distinguises the experienced doctor from a fledgeling intern is that the first one, based on his experience can develope a new approach for treating the disease, while the novice will apply the standard treatments he learned from books

We live in an age of big data. The amount of data collectd every day is tremendous and requires quite long time for analysis and interpretation. Thus, any novice entering in a field requires accumulation of significant evidence in order to make a breakthrough discovery. For example, in astronomy, the observation of celestial objects events can take years even centuries. Astronomers can spend their lives collecting the observational data without significant progress. An unexperienced astronomer might need some time to analyze and understand the years of observational data bevore he can proceed with some new ideas.

One can argue that experience can also be a hindrance for spotting a new trend, and only a novice, whose ideas are not constrained by rules and regulations of the given field, can easily spot a new trend. It might appear to be true, since the history knows of great discoveries made occasionally. However, all these discoveries made by people who at least had some experience in their fields, they were just looking in a wrong direction. Would it be possible for Flemming to discover penicilline if he wouldn't been interested in studying microbes for years? The telescope wouldn't been invented and significant astronomical discoveres wouldn't been done if Gallileo hadn't directed an ordinary looking glass to the celestial objects. Definitely, there were people before Galileo who were using the looking glass to contemplate stars, moon and planets, but it was his genuis and experience, that suggested him to conduct observations on regular basis. These and other examples demonstrate that it is the experience that allows us to have a different perspective on the pedestrian events and figure out the new laws of universe to make significant discoveries.

To conclude, novadays, any field of inquiry deals with significant arrays of data. Processig and interpreting these data drequires possession of some experience. Therefore, I believe that without an experience it would be hard to progress and make a contribution in any field of study.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'significant progress'.
Suggestion: significant progress
...a begginner has a higher chance to make a significant progress in any field of human activity, or at l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depleted'.
Suggestion: depleted
...edge? While I agree that the history is deplete with evidence of unexpected discoveries...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: APART_A_PART[2]
Message: Wrong collocation. Did you mean 'apart from'?
Suggestion: apart from
.... An expert, in any area of inquiry, apart of knowledge possesse an experience, allow...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 503, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... Flemming to discover penicilline if he wouldnt been interested in studying microbes fo...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 573, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...dying microbes for years? The telescope wouldnt been invented and significant astronomi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 635, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...and significant astronomical discoveres wouldnt been done if Gallileo hadnt directed an...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 665, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hadn't
...iscoveres wouldnt been done if Gallileo hadnt directed an ordinary looking glass to t...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, so, still, therefore, thus, while, at least, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2555.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 489.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22494887526 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06304928144 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523517382413 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 831.6 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.802002857 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.75 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.45 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.65 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0964287168608 0.243740707755 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0341846827465 0.0831039109588 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328472058681 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0662516192926 0.150359130593 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227839167898 0.0667264976115 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.